Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: simplify the HashMeddler #205

Merged

Conversation

Stefan-Ethernal
Copy link
Collaborator

@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal commented Nov 28, 2024

Description

This PR simplifies the HashMeddler logic a bit, because it supports both nullable and non-nullable fields. Also, fix some logs and minor stuff.

@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal changed the title Simplify HashMeddler chore: simplify the HashMeddler Nov 28, 2024
@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal self-assigned this Nov 28, 2024
@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal force-pushed the CDK-608-apply-missing-feedback-from-pr branch from 7b0f126 to b46fd98 Compare November 28, 2024 12:14
@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal changed the base branch from develop to release/v0.5.0 November 28, 2024 12:14
@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal merged commit 302da09 into release/v0.5.0 Nov 29, 2024
5 checks passed
@Stefan-Ethernal Stefan-Ethernal deleted the CDK-608-apply-missing-feedback-from-pr branch November 29, 2024 15:11
Vui-Chee added a commit to okx/xlayer-cdk that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
* tag 'v0.5.0-beta6':
  feat: write on database the number of retries per certificate and the certificates in a history table (0xPolygon#208)
  feat: return an error in case agglayer returns certificate with height lower than in local storage (0xPolygon#209)
  chore: simplify the `HashMeddler` (0xPolygon#205)
  fix: clean proof table on start (0xPolygon#207) (0xPolygon#210)
  feat: improve logs (0xPolygon#204)
  fix: cdk603 error calculating previousLocalExitRoot (0xPolygon#199)
  fix: Integration Bali PP (0xPolygon#198)
  feat: check agglayer certificate and use as initial if db is empty (0xPolygon#192)
  feat: sqlite aggregator (0xPolygon#189)
  feat: BridgeMessage e2e test (0xPolygon#184)
  feat: aggsender e2e (0xPolygon#183)
  fix: aggregating proofs (0xPolygon#191) (0xPolygon#193)
  feat: l1infotreesync can be run as individual component (0xPolygon#188)
  fix: l1infotree flaky test (0xPolygon#182)
  fix: `L1InfoRootIncorrect` error from `agglayer` (0xPolygon#185)
  feat: improve aggsender logs (0xPolygon#186) (0xPolygon#187)
  feat: remove sanity check (0xPolygon#178) (0xPolygon#179)
  refact: GetSequence method (0xPolygon#169)
  feat: epoch notifier (0xPolygon#144)
  feat: unpack and log agglayer errors (0xPolygon#158)
Vui-Chee added a commit to okx/xlayer-cdk that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2024
* dev: (22 commits)
  fix issues
  feat: healthcheck (#11)
  feat: write on database the number of retries per certificate and the certificates in a history table (0xPolygon#208)
  feat: return an error in case agglayer returns certificate with height lower than in local storage (0xPolygon#209)
  chore: simplify the `HashMeddler` (0xPolygon#205)
  fix: clean proof table on start (0xPolygon#207) (0xPolygon#210)
  feat: improve logs (0xPolygon#204)
  fix: cdk603 error calculating previousLocalExitRoot (0xPolygon#199)
  fix: Integration Bali PP (0xPolygon#198)
  feat: check agglayer certificate and use as initial if db is empty (0xPolygon#192)
  feat: sqlite aggregator (0xPolygon#189)
  feat: BridgeMessage e2e test (0xPolygon#184)
  feat: aggsender e2e (0xPolygon#183)
  fix: aggregating proofs (0xPolygon#191) (0xPolygon#193)
  feat: l1infotreesync can be run as individual component (0xPolygon#188)
  fix: l1infotree flaky test (0xPolygon#182)
  fix: `L1InfoRootIncorrect` error from `agglayer` (0xPolygon#185)
  feat: improve aggsender logs (0xPolygon#186) (0xPolygon#187)
  feat: remove sanity check (0xPolygon#178) (0xPolygon#179)
  refact: GetSequence method (0xPolygon#169)
  ...
joanestebanr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2024
* Simplify HashMeddler

* fix: TestCertificateHeaderString UT
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants