-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
simplify CoreEval proposals #59
Conversation
e241b6b
to
9963d44
Compare
26d3266
to
40c0cf6
Compare
40c0cf6
to
6602899
Compare
6602899
to
88dd0da
Compare
When I restored the earlier packages, the refactorings didn't work without updating their dep on synthetic-chain. I didn't want to invalidate all those layers so I rolled back changes to earlier proposals. To validate that the synthetic-chain work I still updated That uncovered a couple bugs since the |
e67cc7e
to
8349972
Compare
7dddf02
to
f88dd75
Compare
This CI run took 105m compared to 62m in the last PR, I don't see any changes that look suspicious so I suspect it's transient. I'm going to merge and keep an eye on it. |
closes: #21
Handles all the CoreEval proposal execution in the framework, so there's no longer an
eval.sh
or any proposal-specific code.What it abstracts is a little messy but I think the abstraction is right. The internals can be cleaned up later. I'm holding off on that until more of the use cases are fleshed out.