Replies: 6 comments 5 replies
-
It is not a criminal itself and we declare foreground service type as
required and request specific permission. What is the exact Google
complaint?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I still don't understand what else is incorrect. It seems that a fix is
suggested in the section "To bring your app into compliance, follow
these steps", but the links there are unavailable without Google play
account.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Being passed true as an argument TeamTalkService.displayNotification()
displays or updates (if it is displayed already) TeamTalk notification
in the notification panel. By the way, initial notification display is
accompanied by turning the foreground mode on. On the contrary, being
passed false it removes TeamTalk notification from the notification
panel and turns foreground mode off.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
It should not cause a visible runtime difference, but starting
foreground without specifying service type (third argument) is somewhat
deprecated in modern Android. Thus, I hope that this variant will not be
discarded by Google play.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Of course, but I still think that the service should be foreground and,
thus, the corresponding permissions are necessary.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
As I understand, this could happen when posting notifications is
disabled for the application. In that case the service itself goes
foreground, but without showing the notification, being visible only in
the task manager.
I found a good detailed guide about foreground services in Android at
***@***.***/guide-to-foreground-services-on-android-9d0127dc8f9ar
As I conclude from it, the problem is not in the permission request
itself, but in the fact that some additional information should be
provided.
Though I recommend merging #2223 anyway, since it increases SDK upgrade
tolerance at least.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi @poretsky and @beqabeqa473 Build version 126 was reject by Google Play Store because we're using Manifest.permission.FOREGROUND_SERVICE
Isn't this permission required when the app goes to the background and the user should still be able to hear voice?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions