Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

box tracks droplet radius instead of area #313

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

amylu00
Copy link
Member

@amylu00 amylu00 commented Feb 6, 2024

Purpose

Generalize box model with individual droplet radius in state vector instead of total surface area

To-do

Content


  • I have read and checked the items on the review checklist.

@amylu00 amylu00 self-assigned this Feb 6, 2024
@amylu00 amylu00 requested a review from trontrytel February 6, 2024 00:08
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (4e03889) 98.74% compared to head (8a54570) 98.74%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #313   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.74%   98.74%           
=======================================
  Files          33       33           
  Lines         875      875           
=======================================
  Hits          864      864           
  Misses         11       11           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@trontrytel
Copy link
Member

@amylu00 - should we close this one for now?

@amylu00
Copy link
Member Author

amylu00 commented Feb 7, 2024

@amylu00 - should we close this one for now?

I'll keep the changes for the constant area box problem and just use that one for testing P3/CM.jl ice nucleation functions

@amylu00 amylu00 closed this Feb 8, 2024
@amylu00 amylu00 deleted the al/generalize_box branch October 22, 2024 17:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants