CI pipeline validations and inferences #517
Closed
justin2004
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@justin2004 One of the QC queries has a syntax error that's blocking automated execution during builds. Working to fix that here (#519). You can see here (https://github.com/CommonCoreOntology/CommonCoreOntologies/actions/runs/10863650645/job/30148040122) outputs of a previous build where the QCs are executing as well as where HermiT is being leveraged to check for consistency. Which is to say, absolutely good ideas :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I noticed in here we have SPARQL validations but I don't think the execution of them is automated. Would that be a welcome feature if I automated that?
Also it might be nice to include the execution of a reasoner so the CI pipeline can fail if we have an inconsistent ontology or malformed RDF files.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions