You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the ACCC draft rules it is specified that authorisation can be provided by a customer for "Single Use" as opposed to a duration of authorisation.
It is proposed that, for an authorisation that is "Single Use", only an access token will be returned and no refresh token will be returned. As a result, once the access token as expired, no further data retrieval will be possible and the authorisation is effectively also expired.
Does anyone have any concerns with this approach?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We support this approach, but note that customers are likely to experience token lifetime with joint consents unless access tokens are not granted until both parties authorise the accounts in a consent. We therefore suggest that approach.
The ACCC CDR Rules calls out that the need for a Bank to implement a Joint Account Management Service that will operate independently of the Consumer Data Request Service.
The implication of this is that a Single Use consent will only allow for the sharing of joint accounts that had previously be authorised for sharing by the joint account holders via the Joint Account Management Service.
In the ACCC draft rules it is specified that authorisation can be provided by a customer for "Single Use" as opposed to a duration of authorisation.
It is proposed that, for an authorisation that is "Single Use", only an access token will be returned and no refresh token will be returned. As a result, once the access token as expired, no further data retrieval will be possible and the authorisation is effectively also expired.
Does anyone have any concerns with this approach?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: