test 467

[d-chambers]

Description

This PR adds a test for issue #467. It turns out it wasn't really an issue; the example just needs to use a timedelta rather than float in the step argument.

Checklist

I have (if applicable):

• referenced the GitHub issue this PR closes.
• documented the new feature with docstrings or appropriate doc page.
• included a test. See testing guidelines.
• your name has been added to the contributors page (docs/contributors.md).
• added the "ready_for_review" tag once the PR is ready to be reviewed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Added a new test method to verify datetime object handling in coordinate retrieval functionality.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new test method test_get_coord_datetime in the tests/test_core/test_coords.py file. This test verifies that the get_coord function can accept datetime objects as input. It creates two datetime objects and a one-minute step, then calls get_coord and asserts that the minimum coordinate value matches the string representation of the first datetime, while the maximum value reflects the second datetime plus the step.

Changes

File	Change Summary
tests/test_core/test_coords.py	- Added import for datetime module - Added new test method test_get_coord_datetime to verify datetime input handling

Poem

🕰️ A test of time, a rabbit's delight,
Coordinates dance with datetime's might
One minute steps, precision so keen
In code's embrace, a temporal scene
Hop, hop, hooray for testing's glow! 🐰✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 39a5122 and 0e6bdbb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/test_core/test_coords.py (2 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• tests/test_core/test_coords.py

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

tests/test_core/test_coords.py (1)

364-371: Test coverage expansion is valid and well-structured.
The new test verifies that get_coord() correctly handles datetime objects and a timedelta step. Consider adding an assertion for coord.max() as well, to fully confirm the upper bound behavior.

         coord = get_coord(start=d1, stop=d2, step=step)
         assert str(d1) == str(coord.min())
+        assert str(d2) == str(coord.max())

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ed99b6 and f0a941b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/test_core/test_coords.py (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

tests/test_core/test_coords.py (1)

5-5: Import usage looks good.
No concerns here; importing datetime from the standard library is appropriate for the new test.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.85%. Comparing base (0ed99b6) to head (0e6bdbb).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #481   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.85%   99.85%           
=======================================
  Files         118      118           
  Lines        9700     9700           
=======================================
  Hits         9686     9686           
  Misses         14       14           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	99.85% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[d-chambers]

closes #467