minor fix for LF proc #484
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on enhancing the low-frequency processing documentation by updating memory limits and chunk size calculation logic. The memory limit has been significantly increased from 75 MB to 1,000 MB, allowing for larger data processing capabilities. The chunk size calculation now directly uses the spool's time coordinates to determine its length, improving the accuracy of processing workflow and ensuring that chunk sizes do not exceed the actual spool length. Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/recipes/low_freq_proc.qmd (2)
72-81: LGTM! Memory-efficient implementation of spool length calculation.The new implementation correctly uses time coordinates to determine spool length, avoiding the memory-intensive operation of merging the spool. The warning message is clear and the adjustment logic is sound.
Consider using an f-string for better readability in the warning message:
- print( - f"Warning: Specified `chunk_size` ({chunk_size:.2f} seconds) exceeds the spool length " - f"({spool_length:.2f} seconds). Adjusting `chunk_size` to match spool length." - ) + print(f"""Warning: Specified `chunk_size` ({chunk_size:.2f} seconds) exceeds the spool length \ +({spool_length:.2f} seconds). Adjusting `chunk_size` to match spool length.""")
Line range hint
1-1: Consider enhancing the documentation header.The documentation is thorough and well-structured. Consider adding:
- A brief section about memory requirements and considerations.
- Expected processing times for different data sizes.
- Troubleshooting tips for memory-related issues.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/recipes/low_freq_proc.qmd(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/recipes/low_freq_proc.qmd (2)
42-42: Verify the significant memory limit increase.The memory limit has been increased from 75MB to 1,000MB. While this allows processing larger chunks of data, it might not be suitable for all environments.
Consider:
- Adding a comment explaining why 1,000MB was chosen as the default.
- Documenting minimum system requirements.
- Adding a warning if the system's available memory is less than this limit.
106-106: LGTM! Improved variable naming consistency.The rename from
delta_pa_lfp_secondstodelta_pa_lfp_lengthimproves code clarity by maintaining consistent terminology throughout the file.Also applies to: 110-110
Fun! :) |
Ya, they offer free code reviews for open-source projects so I thought I would try it out. |
Description
Minor changes to PR #470 for the low-frequency processing recipe to make the code clearer and avoid filling memory with
spool.chunk(time=None)[0].seconds(to get spool's length).Checklist
I have (if applicable):
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation