-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
add rollback to config experiments on Windows #37494
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: branden.clark/fleet-config-exp
Are you sure you want to change the base?
add rollback to config experiments on Windows #37494
Conversation
Gitlab CI Configuration ChangesModified Jobsnew-e2e-installer-windows new-e2e-installer-windows:
after_script:
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/junit_upload.sh "junit-${CI_JOB_ID}.tgz" "$E2E_RESULT_JSON"
artifacts:
expire_in: 2 weeks
paths:
- $E2E_OUTPUT_DIR
- $E2E_RESULT_JSON
- junit-*.tgz
reports:
annotations:
- $EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH
when: always
before_script:
- CURRENT_AGENT_VERSION=$(dda inv agent.version) || exit $?; export CURRENT_AGENT_VERSION
- CURRENT_AGENT_VERSION_PACKAGE=$(dda inv agent.version --url-safe)-1 || exit $?;
export CURRENT_AGENT_VERSION_PACKAGE
- mkdir -p $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache && tar xJf modcache_e2e.tar.xz -C $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache
|| exit 101
- rm -f modcache_e2e.tar.xz
- mkdir -p ~/.aws
- "if [ -n \"$E2E_USE_AWS_PROFILE\" ]; then\n echo Using agent-qa-ci aws profile\n\
\ $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E profile >> ~/.aws/config\
\ || exit $?\n # Now all `aws` commands target the agent-qa profile\n export\
\ AWS_PROFILE=agent-qa-ci\nelse\n # Assume role to fetch only once credentials\
\ and avoid rate limits\n echo Assuming ddbuild-agent-ci role\n roleoutput=\"\
$(aws sts assume-role --role-arn arn:aws:iam::669783387624:role/ddbuild-agent-ci\
\ --external-id ddbuild-agent-ci --role-session-name RoleSession)\"\n export\
\ AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=\"$(echo \"$roleoutput\" | jq -r '.Credentials.AccessKeyId')\"\
\n export AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=\"$(echo \"$roleoutput\" | jq -r '.Credentials.SecretAccessKey')\"\
\n export AWS_SESSION_TOKEN=\"$(echo \"$roleoutput\" | jq -r '.Credentials.SessionToken')\"\
\nfi\n"
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_public_key_rsa > $E2E_AWS_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH
|| exit $?
- touch $E2E_AWS_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && chmod 600 $E2E_AWS_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh
$AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_key_rsa > $E2E_AWS_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH || exit $?
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_public_key_rsa > $E2E_AZURE_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH
|| exit $?
- touch $E2E_AZURE_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && chmod 600 $E2E_AZURE_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH &&
$CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_key_rsa > $E2E_AZURE_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH
|| exit $?
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_public_key_rsa > $E2E_GCP_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH
|| exit $?
- touch $E2E_GCP_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && chmod 600 $E2E_GCP_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh
$AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_key_rsa > $E2E_GCP_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH || exit $?
- pulumi login "s3://dd-pulumi-state?region=us-east-1&awssdk=v2&profile=$AWS_PROFILE"
- ARM_CLIENT_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE client_id)
|| exit $?; export ARM_CLIENT_ID
- ARM_CLIENT_SECRET=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE token)
|| exit $?; export ARM_CLIENT_SECRET
- ARM_TENANT_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE tenant_id)
|| exit $?; export ARM_TENANT_ID
- ARM_SUBSCRIPTION_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE subscription_id)
|| exit $?; export ARM_SUBSCRIPTION_ID
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_GCP credentials_json > ~/gcp-credentials.json
|| exit $?
- export GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS=~/gcp-credentials.json
- dda inv -- -e gitlab.generate-ci-visibility-links --output=$EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH
image: registry.ddbuild.io/ci/test-infra-definitions/runner$TEST_INFRA_DEFINITIONS_BUILDIMAGES_SUFFIX:$TEST_INFRA_DEFINITIONS_BUILDIMAGES
needs:
- go_e2e_deps
- deploy_windows_testing-a7
- deploy_installer_oci
- deploy_agent_oci
- qa_installer_script_windows
parallel:
matrix:
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestUpgradeMSI$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestUpgradeAgentPackage$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestUpgradeAgentPackageWithAltDir$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestUpgradeAgentPackageAfterRollback$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestDowngradeAgentPackage$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestStopExperiment$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestExperimentForNonExistingPackageFails$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestExperimentCurrentVersionFails$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestStopWithoutExperiment$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestRevertsExperimentWhenServiceDies$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestRevertsExperimentWhenTimeout$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestExperimentMSIRollbackMaintainsCustomUserAndAltDir$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestRevertsExperimentWhenServiceDiesMaintainsCustomUserAndAltDir$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestRunAgentMSIAfterExperiment$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgrades$/TestUpgradeWithAgentUser$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgradesOnDC$/TestUpgradeMSI$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgradesOnDC$/TestUpgradeAgentPackage$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgradesOnDCWithGMSA$/TestUpgradeMSI$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgradesOnDCWithGMSA$/TestUpgradeAgentPackage$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgradesFromGA$/TestUpgradeAgentPackage$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentUpgradesFromGA$/TestUpgradeAgentPackageAfterRollback$"
+ - EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentConfig$/TestConfigUpgradeSuccessful$"
+ - EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentConfig$/TestConfigUpgradeFailure$"
+ - EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentConfig$/TestConfigUpgradeNewAgents$"
+ - EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentConfig$/TestRevertsConfigExperimentWhenServiceDies$"
+ - EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentConfig$/TestRevertsConfigExperimentWhenTimeout$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestInstallExe$/TestInstallAgentPackage$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestInstallScript$/TestInstallAgentPackage$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestInstallScript$/TestInstallFromOldInstaller$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestInstallScript$/TestFailedUnsupportedVersion$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestInstallScriptWithAgentUser$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestInstallScriptWithAgentUserOnDC$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestInstaller$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestDotnetLibraryInstalls$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestDotnetLibraryInstallsWithoutIIS/TestInstallDotnetLibraryPackageWithoutIIS$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestDotnetLibraryInstallsWithoutIIS/TestMSIInstallDotnetLibraryFailsWithoutIIS$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentMSIInstallsDotnetLibrary/TestInstallFromMSI$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentMSIInstallsDotnetLibrary/TestMSIThenRemoteUpgrade$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentMSIInstallsDotnetLibrary/TestUpgradeWithMSI$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentMSIInstallsDotnetLibrary/TestMSIRollbackRemovesLibrary$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentMSIInstallsDotnetLibrary/TestMSISkipRollbackIfInstalled$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestAgentMSIInstallsDotnetLibrary/TestUninstallKeepsLibrary$"
retry: 1
rules:
- if: $RUN_E2E_TESTS == "off"
when: never
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
when: never
- if: $RUN_E2E_TESTS == "on"
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_TAG =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+-rc\.[0-9]+$/
when: on_success
- changes:
compare_to: $COMPARE_TO_BRANCH
paths:
- .gitlab/e2e/e2e.yml
- test/new-e2e/pkg/**/*
- test/new-e2e/go.mod
- flakes.yaml
- release.json
- changes:
compare_to: $COMPARE_TO_BRANCH
paths:
- .gitlab/**/*
- omnibus/config/**/*
- pkg/fleet/**/*
- cmd/installer/**/*
- test/new-e2e/tests/installer/**/*
- tasks/installer.py
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
when: never
- allow_failure: true
when: manual
script:
- dda inv -- -e new-e2e-tests.run --local-package $CI_PROJECT_DIR/$OMNIBUS_BASE_DIR
--result-json $E2E_RESULT_JSON --targets $TARGETS -c ddagent:imagePullRegistry=669783387624.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com
-c ddagent:imagePullUsername=AWS -c ddagent:imagePullPassword=$(aws ecr get-login-password)
--junit-tar junit-${CI_JOB_ID}.tgz ${EXTRA_PARAMS} --test-washer --logs-folder=$E2E_OUTPUT_DIR/logs
--logs-post-processing --logs-post-processing-test-depth=$E2E_LOGS_PROCESSING_TEST_DEPTH
stage: e2e
tags:
- arch:amd64
variables:
E2E_AWS_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-aws-ssh-key
E2E_AWS_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-aws-ssh-key.pub
E2E_AZURE_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-azure-ssh-key
E2E_AZURE_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-azure-ssh-key.pub
E2E_COMMIT_SHA: $CI_COMMIT_SHORT_SHA
E2E_GCP_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-gcp-ssh-key
E2E_GCP_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-gcp-ssh-key.pub
E2E_KEY_PAIR_NAME: datadog-agent-ci-rsa
E2E_LOGS_PROCESSING_TEST_DEPTH: 1
E2E_OUTPUT_DIR: $CI_PROJECT_DIR/e2e-output
E2E_PIPELINE_ID: $CI_PIPELINE_ID
E2E_RESULT_JSON: $CI_PROJECT_DIR/e2e_test_output.json
E2E_USE_AWS_PROFILE: 'false'
EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH: external_links_$CI_JOB_ID.json
FLAKY_PATTERNS_CONFIG: $CI_PROJECT_DIR/flaky-patterns-runtime.yaml
FLEET_INSTALL_METHOD: windows
KUBERNETES_CPU_REQUEST: 6
KUBERNETES_MEMORY_LIMIT: 16Gi
KUBERNETES_MEMORY_REQUEST: 12Gi
SHOULD_RUN_IN_FLAKES_FINDER: 'true'
TARGETS: ./tests/installer/windows
TEAM: fleet Changes Summary
ℹ️ Diff available in the job log. |
Uncompressed package size comparisonComparison with ancestor Diff per package
Decision |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 06e08cf Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +1.82 | [-0.87, +4.52] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +1.13 | [-1.77, +4.03] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.68 | [+0.59, +0.78] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | +0.59 | [+0.43, +0.76] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | +0.52 | [+0.38, +0.65] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.51 | [+0.45, +0.58] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.45 | [+0.31, +0.60] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +0.08 | [-0.81, +0.98] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.08 | [-0.55, +0.72] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.07 | [-0.49, +0.63] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.55, +0.65] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.58, +0.66] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.62, +0.68] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.27, +0.29] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.23, +0.24] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.02, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | egress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.67, +0.58] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | -0.09 | [-0.20, +0.02] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | egress throughput | -0.15 | [-0.76, +0.45] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | -0.18 | [-0.22, -0.14] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.22 | [-0.28, -0.16] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | -0.27 | [-0.39, -0.15] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | -0.35 | [-0.39, -0.32] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 0/10 | |
❌ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 9/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
❌ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 9/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
❌ Failed. Some Quality Gates were violated.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 9/10 replicas passed. Failed 1 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 9/10 replicas passed. Failed 1 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
What does this PR do?
add rollback to config experiments on Windows
Same as update experiments, watchdog process restores stable if services stop or timeout
Adds
set-config-catalog
daemon API/subcommand set, similar toset-catalog
, to allow for overriding the configs used by the daemon.Motivation
https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/WINA-1529
Describe how you validated your changes
new e2e tests cover scenario where service starts but then fails somehow
existing e2e test cover scenario where service fails to start at all
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes