You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The naming discussion about legal_entity vs legal_person has led to the situation where
The required block on line 215 requires legal_entity, but only legal_person and legal_representative are defined in the schema block above.
This should NOT be considered input to what it should be called, this is just a fix to make the JSON schema valid.
(alternatively we could change the object name on line 49, but multiple instances below use the same name + something more. )
So suggesting fix on line 216 as a quick fix, until the decision on actual name is landed so that the schema is valid.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The naming discussion about legal_entity vs legal_person has led to the situation where
The required block on line 215 requires legal_entity, but only legal_person and legal_representative are defined in the schema block above.
This should NOT be considered input to what it should be called, this is just a fix to make the JSON schema valid.
(alternatively we could change the object name on line 49, but multiple instances below use the same name + something more. )
So suggesting fix on line 216 as a quick fix, until the decision on actual name is landed so that the schema is valid.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: