Skip to content

Win7 Pro x64 -> GPU-process is broken after launching a browser using "Runas" command. #237

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
one-way-ticket opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 7 comments

Comments

@one-way-ticket
Copy link

one-way-ticket commented Jan 7, 2025

r3dfox ESR 128.4, 128.6.
Win 7 Pro x64.
AMD FirePro M4000,

I use runas for starting browser -
%WINDIR%\system32\runas.exe /savecred /user:%COMPUTERNAME%\Test_user c:\r3dfox\r3dfox_esr.exe

After start i see problem in about:support:

Graphics

Features
Window Device Pixel Ratios 1.25
Compositing WebRender (Software)

GPU #1
Active Yes
Description AMD FirePro M4000
Vendor ID 0x1002
Device ID 0x682d
Driver Version 13.200.0.0
Driver Date 9-11-2013
Drivers aticfx64 aticfx64 aticfx64 aticfx32 aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64
Subsys ID 176b103c
RAM 1024

GPU #2
Active No
RAM 0

Remote Processes

Type Count
Web Content 1 / 4
Extension 1
Preallocated 3
Socket 1
Utility JavaScript Oracle 1

Failure Log

(#0) Error Fallback WR to SW-WR + D3D11
(#1) Error Failed to connect GPU process
(#2) Error [D3D11] failed to get compositor device.
(#3) Error Failed to initialize CompositorD3D11 for SWGL: FEATURE_FAILURE_D3D11_NO_DEVICE
(#4) Error [D3D11] failed to get compositor device.
(#5) Error Failed to initialize CompositorD3D11 for SWGL: FEATURE_FAILURE_D3D11_NO_DEVICE

But if starting browser without "runas" - this problem is missing:
c:\r3dfox\r3dfox_esr.exe

Graphics

Features
Window Device Pixel Ratios 1.25
Compositing WebRender
Font Visibility Debug Info Windows Platform

Remote Processes

Type Count
Web Content 1 / 4
Extension 1
Preallocated 3
GPU 1
Socket 1
Utility JavaScript Oracle 1

Failure Log

empty

Original Firefox ESR 115 and MyPal68 working fine from runas.
Please, сould you check the launch of the browser through the standard "Runas" command?

@K4sum1
Copy link
Member

K4sum1 commented Jan 23, 2025

I can't even get the browser to run with runas on my end.

C:\Users\Admin>%WINDIR%\system32\runas.exe /savecred /user:%COMPUTERNAME%\caulk "C:\Users\Admin\Desktop\plasmafox-133.0.en-US.win64\plasmafox.exe"
Attempting to start C:\Users\Admin\Desktop\plasmafox-133.0.en-US.win64\plasmafox.exe as user "VERTUALBOX-7\caulk" ...
Enter the password for VERTUALBOX-7\caulk:
Attempting to start C:\Users\Admin\Desktop\plasmafox-133.0.en-US.win64\plasmafox.exe as user "VERTUALBOX-7\caulk" ...
RUNAS ERROR: Unable to run - C:\Users\Admin\Desktop\plasmafox-133.0.en-US.win64\plasmafox.exe
-2147467259: Unspecified error

@K4sum1
Copy link
Member

K4sum1 commented May 22, 2025

Does the latest release fix the issue?

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/releases/tag/b136.0.4-1

@one-way-ticket
Copy link
Author

Does the latest release fix the issue?

https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/releases/tag/b136.0.4-1

Yes, problem fixed.
I checked "r3dfox-136.0.4.en-US.win64.portable" and "runas" worked fine in Win7 Pro x64.
No errors in about:support, GPU-process started & worked.
Thanks!
Is it possible to fix next build 128.x?

@K4sum1
Copy link
Member

K4sum1 commented May 27, 2025

I forgot you reported the issue with 128. Does the previous 136 or 135 release work?

@one-way-ticket
Copy link
Author

I forgot you reported the issue with 128. Does the previous 136 or 135 release work?

Release 136.0.4.2403 (Build ID 20250419204943) - have problem with "runas".
Release 136.0.4.5503 (b136.0.4-1) (Build ID 20250522033237) - no problem with "runas".

@K4sum1
Copy link
Member

K4sum1 commented May 27, 2025

@e3kskoy7wqk I might rebase 128 ESR off of your 128 rework code. Are there any major issues I should be aware of with 128 or is that codebase pretty stable?

@e3kskoy7wqk
Copy link

It should be fairly stable, since my current patchset was incrementally upgraded from the patches for version 128. However, I haven't conducted extensive testing on it.

Resolved issues and known issues: e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7#15 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants