You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2025. It is now read-only.
Currently, proguard obfuscates inner class's reference field to the outer class for instance inner classes. As a result, these fields have intermediary names assigned, but these names are very hard to find out and to be used by modders. (They need to javap the inner class to find out the correct intermediary name) It would be a grace if we can automatically map these outer class reference fields' names to this$0 instead, which would allow easier shadowing usage by modders writing mixins
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Currently, proguard obfuscates inner class's reference field to the outer class for instance inner classes. As a result, these fields have intermediary names assigned, but these names are very hard to find out and to be used by modders. (They need to javap the inner class to find out the correct intermediary name) It would be a grace if we can automatically map these outer class reference fields' names to
this$0
instead, which would allow easier shadowing usage by modders writing mixinsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: