chore: add a test for 1069 #1076
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rowanmanning
force-pushed
the
test-for-1069
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b45e8c9 to
8e35858
Compare
rowanmanning
force-pushed
the
test-for-1069
branch
from
8e35858 to
ca58fc2
Compare
CyntiBinti
approved these changes
Jun 26, 2024
rowanmanning
force-pushed
the
test-for-1069
branch
from
ca58fc2 to
e702a72
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This test illustrates that #1069 is only present when using pino-pretty. In production with JSON logs, the
timestampproperty is present as expected.