Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
Do functional methods even get populated in the Typedocs? I canny see any in the documentation. Types like should not be hidden (in typedocs):
Functions like should be documented rather than just put in TypeDocs IMO:
I think as and when users ask for functionality that we have within the SDK, but isn't currently documented, we should make a better effort in rectifying this. That way the documentation can grow organically. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
Closing this discussion for now as I've created this issue based on the feedback. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Since #835 was addressed, there are a number of functions within the account package which are relevant to consumers that are currently marked as
hidden
such as getTransactionsSummaries for instance.Now that we have a more structured approach to documentation we can discuss how we want to articulate these exported functions. These include:
There may be some others missing, but I would like to hear others thoughts @FuelLabs/sdk-ts
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions