“Mandatory” fields in MSR? (=> User Guide update?) #196
Unanswered
jhaasdyk-au
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks @jhaasdyk-au. Yes, clarification on mandatory fields should be added to the documentation. This can be accommodated in the next release. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The purpose of this github discussion is to:
i.e. to inform additional user(self)-education, or potential enhancements or defects.
All findings and recommendations are my own and may not correctly represent current or planned DynAdjust behaviour.
PRIORITY: LOW
This discussion asks if DynAdjust Users Guide could/should clarify the following:
Why only for GNSS measurement, when all MSR types support the epoch field?
I would suggest an update to Section B.1.4 to clarify the above.
BACKGROUND:
All references below are to the DynAdjust Users Manual (Sept 2022) unless otherwise noted:
Section B.3.2 Measurement information (DynAdjust Markup Language (DynaML) format)
Section 3.2.7 Verification and error checking.
Section B.1.2 Header line
“The reference frame/geoid model and epoch/version fields [in the header line] are non–mandatory”
Section 3.3.1 Reference Frame
**IN PRACTICE:**
Section B.1.4 Measurement information (including subsections for each measurement type)
[Note: epoch can be (optionally) also provided in file header]
[Note: reference frame can be (optionally) also provided in file header]
It is also interesting to note:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions