[Feature Request]: Official Docker Image for LightRAG

[aospan]

Do you need to file a feature request?

• I have searched the existing feature request and this feature request is not already filed.
• I believe this is a legitimate feature request, not just a question or bug.

Feature Request Description

Currently, Docker Hub hosts 17 different images for LightRAG, created by various contributors, making it challenging to identify the most stable and up-to-date version.

Please consider publishing an official Docker image under an authoritative repository (e.g., lightrag/lightrag).

An official Docker image would:

• Ensure a trusted and regularly updated source.
• Simplify deployment and maintenance.
• Prevent confusion caused by multiple unofficial builds.

Example official repository structure: hub.docker.com/r/lightrag/lightrag

Thank you for considering this fr!

Additional Context

No response

[danielaskdd]

Thank you for the great idea. I noticed the Docker Compose file referenced in #1356. To streamline the process, could you please simplify it into a standard Docker Compose format? This will enable the LightRAG team to efficiently publish Docker images based on it.

For simplicity, I recommend that the official Docker image initially support only two storage types: PostgreSQL and Neo4j. Cause this two storage is proved to work perfectly with LightRAG. And this approach will help reduce complexity during the initial rollout.

Let me know if you have any questions or need further clarification.

Here is storage configuration:

LIGHTRAG_KV_STORAGE=PGKVStorage
LIGHTRAG_VECTOR_STORAGE=PGVectorStorage
LIGHTRAG_DOC_STATUS_STORAGE=PGDocStatusStorage
LIGHTRAG_GRAPH_STORAGE=Neo4JStorage

[helicalchris]

Hi is there any progress on this? Thought I'd ask as I am looking for a docker-compose and yes, it's complicated to choose the right one now!