You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Nature published, in April 2025, two meta-analyses of
13
13
14
-
(a) the [top 100 papers of all time](https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01124-w)
15
-
(b) the [top 25 papers of this century](https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01125-9)
14
+
- the [top 100 papers of all time](https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01124-w)
15
+
- the [top 25 papers of this century](https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-01125-9)
16
16
17
17
Out of EMBL, we have
18
18
19
-
-[the DESeq2 paper](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8), which is on Rank 26 in (a) and Rank 18 in (b)
20
-
-[the CLUSTAL W paper](https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673), on Rank 37 in (a).
21
-
19
+
-[the DESeq2 paper](https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8) (2014) on Rank 26 in *all time*and Rank 18 in *21st century*,
20
+
-[the CLUSTAL W paper](https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673) (1994) on Rank 37 together with [the CLUSTAL X paper](https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.24.4876) (1997) on Rank 83 in *all time*.
21
+
22
22
The actual data are, as usual, in the Supplement files:
0 commit comments