You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was pulling a bunch of data and it would be nice to have Source = "ALL" or something to pull all the potential sources rather than having to list them all. I can work on this (I think).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That's how the package originally worked, but then when I was adding new data sources, it was changing the behavior of older code since the definition of "all" will change each time a new dataset is added. So I moved to forcing people to type out all the data sources they want, which is more future-proof (and makes people think about which data sources to use). But I'd be open to thoughts from you and @mountaindboz
Yeah, I could go either way on this. I think we can write the wq to default to all sources and still have it be easy to update when adding new data sources. But I could also see the advantage of making people be explicit about what data sources they want to integrate. That being said, I have usually used wq to integrate all sources.
I was pulling a bunch of data and it would be nice to have Source = "ALL" or something to pull all the potential sources rather than having to list them all. I can work on this (I think).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: