Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate (but do not remove) the Slurm functionality in this package (and point users to SlurmClusterManager.jl instead) #246

Merged

Conversation

DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member

@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge commented Feb 9, 2025

Depends on:


We'll first release a non-breaking release of ClusterManagers.jl with the deprecation warning.

Then, we'll follow-up with a breaking release of ClusterManagers.jl that fully removes the Slurm functionality from this package.

The README (of this package) will point users to the SlurmClusterManager.jl package instead.

Base automatically changed from dpa/readme-slurmclustermanager to master February 9, 2025 23:02
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge force-pushed the dpa/deprecate-but-do-not-remove-slurm-in-this-package branch from c46a7a1 to d558a54 Compare February 9, 2025 23:02
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge marked this pull request as ready for review February 9, 2025 23:02
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge force-pushed the dpa/deprecate-but-do-not-remove-slurm-in-this-package branch from 577ee74 to d558a54 Compare February 9, 2025 23:26
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge force-pushed the dpa/deprecate-but-do-not-remove-slurm-in-this-package branch from d558a54 to c82f5fe Compare February 9, 2025 23:33
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge force-pushed the dpa/deprecate-but-do-not-remove-slurm-in-this-package branch from c82f5fe to 6b1af89 Compare February 9, 2025 23:59
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 37.85%. Comparing base (84ef921) to head (b35ad48).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/slurm.jl 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #246      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   37.62%   37.85%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         388      391       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          146      148       +2     
- Misses        242      243       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member Author

@kleinhenz What are your thoughts on moving forward with this?

@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge force-pushed the dpa/deprecate-but-do-not-remove-slurm-in-this-package branch from 6b1af89 to cbeb2dc Compare February 10, 2025 00:19
… (and point users to SlurmClusterManager.jl instead)
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge force-pushed the dpa/deprecate-but-do-not-remove-slurm-in-this-package branch from cbeb2dc to b35ad48 Compare February 10, 2025 00:23
@DilumAluthge
Copy link
Member Author

Bump @kleinhenz - Shall we move forward with merging this PR and making a new release of ClusterManagers.jl?

@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge requested review from kleinhenz and removed request for kleinhenz February 14, 2025 16:46
@kleinhenz
Copy link

That makes sense to me

@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge merged commit fde93ce into master Feb 15, 2025
10 checks passed
@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge deleted the dpa/deprecate-but-do-not-remove-slurm-in-this-package branch February 15, 2025 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants