Add linter #1
Add linter #1
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to documentation, configuration files, and code enhancements across multiple components of the MagicMirror² project. Key modifications include the restructuring of the contributing guidelines, the introduction of a new automated testing workflow, improvements to error handling and variable naming in the codebase, and the addition of spell-checking capabilities. Several files received editorial corrections to enhance clarity and professionalism, while new configuration files were added to support linting and spell-checking processes. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
🚮 Removed packages: npm/body-parser@1.20.3, npm/simple-git@3.27.0 |
KristjanESPERANTO
force-pushed
the
linter
branch
from
dbb3942 to
c9ebbad
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
.github/workflows/automated-tests.yaml (4)
2-6: Consider optimizing workflow triggersThe workflow currently runs on both push and pull_request events for the same branches, which could lead to duplicate runs when PRs are updated via pushes.
Consider this optimization:
on: push: - branches: [master, develop] + branches: [develop] pull_request: branches: [master, develop]
8-10: LGTM! Good security practice.Explicitly defining minimal permissions is a security best practice.
Consider enabling branch protection rules for master/develop branches to enforce these checks.
12-14: Optimize job configurationA few suggestions for improvement:
- The 30-minute timeout seems excessive for linting tasks. Consider reducing it to 10 minutes.
- The job name 'run-lint' could be more descriptive since it includes spelling checks too.
Consider these changes:
jobs: - run-lint: + code-quality: runs-on: ubuntu-latest - timeout-minutes: 30 + timeout-minutes: 10
16-16: Enhance workflow loggingThe echo steps could provide more meaningful information for debugging.
Consider these improvements:
- run: echo "Starting automated tests for ${{ github.repository }} on ${{ github.ref }}" + run: echo "🚀 Starting code quality checks for ${{ github.repository }} (ref: ${{ github.ref }})" - run: echo "Test job status is ${{ job.status }}." + run: echo "✨ Code quality checks completed with status: ${{ job.status }}"Also applies to: 30-30
package.json (2)
Line range hint
22-28: Critical: Avoid using 'latest' in dependenciesUsing "latest" version for dependencies is risky as it:
- Makes builds non-reproducible
- Can introduce breaking changes unexpectedly
- May bring in security vulnerabilities without notice
Consider pinning these dependencies to specific versions:
"dependencies": { - "body-parser": "latest", - "lodash": "latest", "node-fetch": "^2.7.0", - "simple-git": "latest", "uuid": "^3.3.2" + "body-parser": "^1.20.2", + "lodash": "^4.17.21", + "simple-git": "^3.22.0" },
37-41: LGTM! Well-structured npm scripts.The scripts provide a good foundation for code quality checks. Consider adding these additional useful commands:
"scripts": { "lint": "eslint .", "lint:fix": "eslint . --fix", "test": "npm run lint && npm run test:spelling", - "test:spelling": "cspell ." + "test:spelling": "cspell .", + "test:spelling:fix": "cspell . --fix", + "prepare": "npm run lint:fix && npm run test:spelling:fix" }eslint.config.mjs (3)
5-10: Consider adding more ignore patternsWhile ignoring minified files is good, consider adding more common ignore patterns such as:
dist/build/node_modules/- Other generated files
This will help improve linting performance and avoid checking generated code.
{ - "ignores": ["**/*.min.js"] + "ignores": [ + "**/*.min.js", + "**/dist/**", + "**/build/**", + "**/node_modules/**" + ] }
14-17: Review the necessity of mixing browser and Node.js globalsIncluding both browser and Node.js globals suggests this code might be running in both environments. This could lead to confusion and potential issues. Consider:
- Separating browser and Node.js specific code into different files
- Using environment-specific configuration files
- Adding comments to clarify the intended environment for each file
42-58: Reconsider disabled modern JavaScript rulesThe ESM configuration is generally good with stricter limits, but consider enabling some of the disabled rules:
prefer-destructuring: Encourages cleaner, more maintainable codefunc-style: Helps maintain consistency in function declarationsThe stricter
max-lines-per-functionlimit of 100 lines is a good practice."rules": { - "func-style": "off", + "func-style": ["warn", "expression"], "max-lines-per-function": ["error", 100], "no-magic-numbers": "off", "one-var": "off", - "prefer-destructuring": "off" + "prefer-destructuring": "warn" }CHANGELOG.md (1)
161-161: Improve writing style for better readabilitySeveral style improvements can be made:
- In the personal note (line 161), consider adding a comma after "Hello" and replace "a lot of" with more specific wording
- In the version 2.0.0 description (line 202), replace informal "stuff" with more professional terminology
Consider these improvements:
-Hello! Ezequiel here. Just wanted to say thanks for trust in me, in the past days I made a lot of changes into the code +Hello, Ezequiel here. Just wanted to say thanks for trusting in me. Over the past days, I've made numerous changes to the code -which brings a new API, custom menus and commands and lots of other stuff: +which brings a new API, custom menus, commands, and several other enhancements:Also applies to: 202-202
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[formatting] ~161-~161: Consider inserting a comma after the opening of your message.
Context: ...y n.n) ## [2.1.0] - 2020-11-01 Hello! Ezequiel here. Just wanted to say thanks for tru...(NNP_COMMA_QUESTION)
[style] ~161-~161: The phrase ‘a lot of’ might be wordy and overused. Consider using an alternative.
Context: ...or trust in me, in the past days I made a lot of changes into the code, adding some func...(A_LOT_OF)
API/api.js (2)
293-293: Consider simplifying the action name assignmentWhile the logic is correct, the code could be more readable.
Consider this alternative:
- actionName = req.params.action ? req.params.action.toUpperCase() : "STATUS"; + actionName = (req.params.action || "STATUS").toUpperCase();
480-480: LGTM: Method name fix and potential enhancementThe method name has been corrected. However, since this is a critical initialization check, consider adding JSDoc documentation to clarify its purpose and return value.
Consider adding documentation:
+/** + * Checks if the module is properly initialized + * @param {Response} res - Express response object + * @returns {boolean} - true if initialized, false otherwise + */ checkInitialized(res) {node_helper.js (2)
526-527: Maintain consistent indentationThe indentation uses tabs while the rest of the file uses spaces. Consider using spaces for consistency.
- var thisConfig = this.getConfig().modules.find(m => m.module === "MMM-Remote-Control").config || {}; - this.sendResponse(res, undefined, { query: query, data: thisConfig.classes ? thisConfig.classes : {} }); + var thisConfig = this.getConfig().modules.find(m => m.module === "MMM-Remote-Control").config || {}; + this.sendResponse(res, undefined, { query: query, data: thisConfig.classes ? thisConfig.classes : {} });
Line range hint
1-1000: Consider splitting into smaller modulesThe file contains a large amount of functionality in a single module. Consider splitting it into smaller, focused modules:
- Configuration management
- Remote control operations
- Module management
- System operations
This would improve maintainability, testability, and make the code easier to understand.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md(1 hunks).github/workflows/automated-tests.yaml(1 hunks).gitignore(0 hunks)API/README.md(4 hunks)API/api.js(7 hunks)CHANGELOG.md(7 hunks)MMM-Remote-Control.js(0 hunks)README.md(5 hunks)cspell.config.json(1 hunks)custom_menu.example.json(5 hunks)docs/swagger.json(1 hunks)eslint.config.mjs(1 hunks)node_helper.js(3 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)remote.js(1 hunks)scripts/download_modules.js(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- .gitignore
- MMM-Remote-Control.js
- scripts/download_modules.js
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- API/README.md
- cspell.config.json
- custom_menu.example.json
- docs/swagger.json
- remote.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...'re trying to keep the module up to date and we're adding new features every time. Y...
(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
[style] ~6-~6: The phrase ‘a lot of’ might be wordy and overused. Consider using an alternative.
Context: ...e. Your contribution help us so much in a lot of ways. We ask you to keep contributing,...
(A_LOT_OF)
[style] ~8-~8: The phrase ‘feel free to’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others and make it sound more professional.
Context: .... We ask you to keep contributing, and feel free to open as many issues and PR as you need....
(FEEL_FREE_TO_STYLE_ME)
CHANGELOG.md
[style] ~13-~13: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ixed problems that were found (Jopyth#308). - Added JavaScript linting (for the start with ...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~14-~14: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ting (for the start with soft rules). - Added GitHub workflow for linting and spell c...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[formatting] ~161-~161: Consider inserting a comma after the opening of your message.
Context: ...y n.n) ## [2.1.0] - 2020-11-01 Hello! Ezequiel here. Just wanted to say thanks for tru...
(NNP_COMMA_QUESTION)
[style] ~161-~161: The phrase ‘a lot of’ might be wordy and overused. Consider using an alternative.
Context: ...or trust in me, in the past days I made a lot of changes into the code, adding some func...
(A_LOT_OF)
[style] ~202-~202: The term ‘stuff’ is sometimes considered to be colloquial. Improve your writing style by using a more professional sounding alternative.
Context: ...om menus and commands and lots of other stuff: ### Added - REST API interface for c...
(REPLACE_THAT_STUFF)
README.md
[uncategorized] ~5-~5: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Additionally’.
Context: ... the power plug every time, am I right? Additionally you can hide and show modules on your m...
(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[typographical] ~58-~58: After the expression ‘for example’ a comma is usually used.
Context: .../config/config.js.sample#L12-L22)). For example change address to 0.0.0.0 and add t...
(COMMA_FOR_EXAMPLE)
[typographical] ~125-~125: After the expression ‘for example’ a comma is usually used.
Context: ... request, or a module notification. For example you can use [MMM-ModuleScheduler](https...
(COMMA_FOR_EXAMPLE)
[grammar] ~125-~125: The word “shutdown” is a noun. The verb is spelled with a white space.
Context: ...1/mmm-modulescheduler) to automatically shutdown your RaspberryPi at a certain time, or ...
(NOUN_VERB_CONFUSION)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
.github/workflows/automated-tests.yaml (1)
24-29: LGTM! Good practices for dependency installation and testing.
Using npm ci for clean installs and separating spelling and linting checks into distinct steps are good practices.
Let's verify the npm scripts exist:
✅ Verification successful
Scripts exist and are properly configured in package.json
The verification confirms that both test:spelling and lint scripts are correctly defined in package.json:
test:spellinguses cspell for spell checkinglintuses eslint for linting- Both are also integrated into the main test script
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the required npm scripts are defined
jq -r '.scripts | select(.["test:spelling"] != null and .lint != null)' package.json
Length of output: 225
package.json (2)
4-4: LGTM! Description update is correct.
The spelling of "MagicMirror" has been properly updated in the description.
30-36:
Verify ESLint version compatibility
The specified ESLint version (^9.15.0) appears incorrect as ESLint's current major version is 8.x.
Consider updating to the correct versions:
"devDependencies": {
- "@eslint/js": "^9.15.0",
+ "@eslint/js": "^8.56.0",
"cspell": "^8.16.0",
- "eslint": "^9.15.0",
+ "eslint": "^8.56.0",
"eslint-plugin-import": "^2.31.0",
"globals": "^15.12.0"
},eslint.config.mjs (2)
61-61: LGTM!
The export statement is correct and follows ESM best practices.
1-3: Consider adding version constraints for dependencies
While the imports are correct, it's recommended to ensure these dependencies have specific version constraints in your package.json to prevent unexpected breaking changes.
API/api.js (5)
53-53: LGTM: Variable name typo fix
The variable name change from availabeActions to availableActions improves code clarity and consistency.
Also applies to: 64-64, 68-68
120-120: LGTM: Method name typo fix
The method name change from checkInititialized to checkInitialized fixes a critical typo that could cause runtime errors.
344-344: LGTM: Consistent method name fix
The method name change maintains consistency with the previous fix.
429-429: LGTM: Improved comment formatting
The comment formatting change enhances readability while maintaining the helpful context about payload handling.
Line range hint 1-524: Overall Assessment: Quality Improvements
The changes consistently fix typos and improve code quality across the file. These improvements align well with the PR's objective of adding a linter. The changes are non-functional but enhance code maintainability and prevent potential runtime errors.
Let's verify that all instances of the renamed method have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
No issues found - method name is correct
The search results confirm that the method name checkInitialized is consistently used across the codebase. All instances use the correct spelling, and there are no occurrences of the misspelled version "checkInititialized". The method is properly defined in API/api.js and correctly used in both API/api.js and node_helper.js.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of the old method name
rg "checkInititialized" --type js
Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for both old and new method names to understand the context better
echo "Searching for checkInitialized method:"
rg "checkInitialized" -A 2 --type js
echo -e "\nSearching for method usage:"
ast-grep --pattern 'if (!this.checkInitialized($$$)) { return $$$; }'
Length of output: 1635
node_helper.js (3)
317-317: LGTM: Improved variable naming consistency
The variable rename from jsfile to jsFile follows JavaScript camelCase naming conventions.
555-555: LGTM: Added initialization safety check
The addition of initialization check prevents potential issues with accessing uninitialized module data.
562-562: LGTM: Added initialization safety check
The addition of initialization check prevents potential issues with accessing uninitialized brightness data.
| uses: actions/setup-node@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| node-version: 22 | ||
| cache: npm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use LTS version of Node.js
Node.js 22 is currently not an LTS version and is in development. This could lead to stability issues.
Use an LTS version instead:
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
- node-version: 22
+ node-version: 20
cache: npm📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| uses: actions/setup-node@v4 | |
| with: | |
| node-version: 22 | |
| cache: npm | |
| uses: actions/setup-node@v4 | |
| with: | |
| node-version: 20 | |
| cache: npm |
| "rules": { | ||
| "capitalized-comments": "off", | ||
| "consistent-this": "off", | ||
| "line-comment-position": "off", | ||
| "max-lines-per-function": ["warn", 200], | ||
| "max-statements": ["warn", 60], | ||
| "multiline-comment-style": "off", | ||
| "no-await-in-loop": "off", | ||
| "no-constant-binary-expression": "warn", | ||
| "no-inline-comments": "off", | ||
| "no-magic-numbers": "off", | ||
| "no-plusplus": "off", | ||
| "no-prototype-builtins": "warn", | ||
| "no-undef": "warn", | ||
| "no-unused-vars": "warn", | ||
| "no-useless-escape": "warn", | ||
| "no-var": "warn", | ||
| "one-var": "off", | ||
| "sort-keys": "off", | ||
| "strict": "off" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider stricter rule settings for critical issues
Several critical rules are set to "warn" instead of "error", which might allow problematic code to slip through:
no-undef: Undefined variables could cause runtime errorsno-unused-vars: Dead code indicatorno-prototype-builtins: Security best practiceno-var: Ensures consistent modern JavaScript
Additionally, the max-statements limit of 60 is quite high and might allow functions to become too complex.
"rules": {
// ... other rules ...
- "max-statements": ["warn", 60],
+ "max-statements": ["warn", 30],
- "no-undef": "warn",
+ "no-undef": "error",
- "no-unused-vars": "warn",
+ "no-unused-vars": "error",
- "no-prototype-builtins": "warn",
+ "no-prototype-builtins": "error",
// ... other rules ...
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "rules": { | |
| "capitalized-comments": "off", | |
| "consistent-this": "off", | |
| "line-comment-position": "off", | |
| "max-lines-per-function": ["warn", 200], | |
| "max-statements": ["warn", 60], | |
| "multiline-comment-style": "off", | |
| "no-await-in-loop": "off", | |
| "no-constant-binary-expression": "warn", | |
| "no-inline-comments": "off", | |
| "no-magic-numbers": "off", | |
| "no-plusplus": "off", | |
| "no-prototype-builtins": "warn", | |
| "no-undef": "warn", | |
| "no-unused-vars": "warn", | |
| "no-useless-escape": "warn", | |
| "no-var": "warn", | |
| "one-var": "off", | |
| "sort-keys": "off", | |
| "strict": "off" | |
| } | |
| "rules": { | |
| "capitalized-comments": "off", | |
| "consistent-this": "off", | |
| "line-comment-position": "off", | |
| "max-lines-per-function": ["warn", 200], | |
| "max-statements": ["warn", 30], | |
| "multiline-comment-style": "off", | |
| "no-await-in-loop": "off", | |
| "no-constant-binary-expression": "warn", | |
| "no-inline-comments": "off", | |
| "no-magic-numbers": "off", | |
| "no-plusplus": "off", | |
| "no-prototype-builtins": "error", | |
| "no-undef": "error", | |
| "no-unused-vars": "error", | |
| "no-useless-escape": "warn", | |
| "no-var": "warn", | |
| "one-var": "off", | |
| "sort-keys": "off", | |
| "strict": "off" | |
| } |
| ## [2.5.0] - Unreleased (`develop` branch) | ||
|
|
||
| ### Added | ||
|
|
||
| - Added a spell checker and fixed problems that were found (#308). | ||
| - Added JavaScript linting (for the start with soft rules). | ||
| - Added GitHub workflow for linting and spell checking on every push and pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the changelog entry with more details
While the entry follows the Keep a Changelog format, it would be more helpful to:
- Consider if 2.5.0 is the appropriate version number for adding linting (this seems like a minor version change)
- Add more details about:
- Which linting tool and rules are being used
- Which spell checker is being implemented
- What exactly the GitHub workflow does
Consider this format:
-## [2.5.0] - Unreleased (`develop` branch)
+## [2.4.1] - Unreleased (`develop` branch)
### Added
-Added a spell checker and fixed problems that were found (#308).
-Added JavaScript linting (for the start with soft rules).
-Added GitHub workflow for linting and spell checking on every push and pull request.
+- Added cspell for spell checking with custom dictionary support (#308)
+- Added ESLint for JavaScript linting with following initial rules:
+ - [list key rules here]
+- Added GitHub Actions workflow that:
+ - Runs ESLint checks
+ - Performs spell checking
+ - Triggers on push and pull request eventsCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~13-~13: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ixed problems that were found (Jopyth#308). - Added JavaScript linting (for the start with ...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~14-~14: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ting (for the start with soft rules). - Added GitHub workflow for linting and spell c...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
| - Added a spell checker and fixed problems that were found (#308). | ||
| - Added JavaScript linting (for the start with soft rules). | ||
| - Added GitHub workflow for linting and spell checking on every push and pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
PR title and description need updating to reflect all changes
The GitHub workflow file confirms the implementation of both spell checking and linting in automated tests, validating the changelog entries. The PR title should be updated to "Add linting and spell checking" to accurately reflect these changes, and a proper description should be added to document the complete scope:
- Addition of spell checker
- JavaScript linting implementation
- GitHub workflow for automated testing
🔗 Analysis chain
Update PR title and description to match changes
The PR title "Add linter" doesn't fully reflect the scope of changes, which include:
- Spell checker addition
- Linting implementation
- Automated testing workflow
Please update the PR title and add a proper description detailing these changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if the workflow file exists and contains both linting and spell checking
gh pr view 1 --json title,body
find .github/workflows -type f -name "*.y*ml" -exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 2053
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~13-~13: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ixed problems that were found (Jopyth#308). - Added JavaScript linting (for the start with ...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~14-~14: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ting (for the start with soft rules). - Added GitHub workflow for linting and spell c...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
Test
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Documentation
Bug Fixes