ExpMaterialTable: consistent initialization #5348
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale
Initialization of the
ExpMaterialTableImpl
is inconsistent and makes it difficult to track how/what initialized the table. This updatesExpMaterialTable
interface to not includepopulate
,setMaterials
norsetSampleType
. Setting materials in this way is not necessary and the single usage,ParentChildView
, has been refactored to generate an IN clause as a base filter.Related Pull Requests
Changes
ExpSampleType
is now done via the constructor and consistently initialized.ExpMaterialTableImpl.populate
no longer takes anExpSampleType
and initializes the sample type because it is done via construction.ExpMaterialTableImpl.setMaterials
setting materials in this way is not necessary and the single usage,ParentChildView
, has been refactored to generate an IN clause as a base filter.ExpMaterialTableImpl
no longer accepts a name since we always want to initialize it to "Materials". Can still be set after initialization viasetName
.