-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add IBM Slip tests #791
Add IBM Slip tests #791
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #791 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 43.72% 43.74% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 65 65
Lines 19035 19039 +4
Branches 2331 2332 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 8324 8328 +4
+ Misses 9304 9303 -1
- Partials 1407 1408 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@haochey will you fix the Frontier problem? |
@sbryngelson Yes, I will work on this once my OCLF account and RSA token is enabled. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested changes to Haocheng for slip cases; should be good to go
Will merge once benchmarking passes, thanks @haochey ! |
Description
This PR adds a few test cases for slip IBM.
Type of change
Scope
If you cannot check the above box, please split your PR into multiple PRs that each have a common goal.
How Has This Been Tested?
Test Configuration: Repeat the IBM tests with "Slip" true.