You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I missed the Information on how exact must the Version match between WebDriver and Browser be. That means, would a Browser with Version 128.0.2739.79 work with a WebDriver with Version 128.0.2739.84 or 128.0.2739.50? Must the main Match follow the first 3 Fields of the Version Number or Not?
AB#54011245
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Patrick,
Thanks für clarifying that.
Kind regards
Helfried
Von: Patrick Brosset ***@***.***>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. September 2024 09:47
An: MicrosoftDocs/edge-developer ***@***.***>
Cc: Helfried Behrendt - IPG ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Betreff: Re: [MicrosoftDocs/edge-developer] [Edge WebDriver Docs Feedback] Version Match between Browser Version and Webdriver Version (Issue #3270)
Sie erhalten nicht oft eine E-Mail von ***@***.******@***.***>. Erfahren Sie, warum dies wichtig ist<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
I asked internally and got the following answer: only the 3 first components of the version number need to match.
For example:
Browser version 128.0.2739.79
would work with:
WebDriver version 128.0.2739.84
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#3270 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BLLJGFNOD3H2WI5IXK2KA4DZYEKFZAVCNFSM6AAAAABOLBIM7SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNZQGQ2TAMJRG4>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I missed the Information on how exact must the Version match between WebDriver and Browser be. That means, would a Browser with Version 128.0.2739.79 work with a WebDriver with Version 128.0.2739.84 or 128.0.2739.50? Must the main Match follow the first 3 Fields of the Version Number or Not?
AB#54011245
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: