+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ We as members, contributors, and leaders pledge to make participation in our +community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body +size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender +identity and expression, level of experience, education, socio-economic status, +nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity +and orientation.
+We pledge to act and interact in ways that contribute to an open, welcoming, +diverse, inclusive, and healthy community.
+Examples of behavior that contributes to a positive environment for our +community include:
+Examples of unacceptable behavior include:
+Community leaders are responsible for clarifying and enforcing our standards of +acceptable behavior and will take appropriate and fair corrective action in +response to any behavior that they deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, +or harmful.
+Community leaders have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject +comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are +not aligned to this Code of Conduct, and will communicate reasons for moderation +decisions when appropriate.
+This Code of Conduct applies within all community spaces, and also applies when +an individual is officially representing the community in public spaces. +Examples of representing our community include using an official e-mail address, +posting via an official social media account, or acting as an appointed +representative at an online or offline event.
+Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be +reported to the community leaders responsible for enforcement at +marcus.lundberg@uppmax.uu.se. +All complaints will be reviewed and investigated promptly and fairly.
+All community leaders are obligated to respect the privacy and security of the +reporter of any incident.
+Community leaders will follow these Community Impact Guidelines in determining +the consequences for any action they deem in violation of this Code of Conduct:
+Community Impact: Use of inappropriate language or other behavior deemed +unprofessional or unwelcome in the community.
+Consequence: A private, written warning from community leaders, providing +clarity around the nature of the violation and an explanation of why the +behavior was inappropriate. A public apology may be requested.
+Community Impact: A violation through a single incident or series +of actions.
+Consequence: A warning with consequences for continued behavior. No +interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction with +those enforcing the Code of Conduct, for a specified period of time. This +includes avoiding interactions in community spaces as well as external channels +like social media. Violating these terms may lead to a temporary or +permanent ban.
+Community Impact: A serious violation of community standards, including +sustained inappropriate behavior.
+Consequence: A temporary ban from any sort of interaction or public +communication with the community for a specified period of time. No public or +private interaction with the people involved, including unsolicited interaction +with those enforcing the Code of Conduct, is allowed during this period. +Violating these terms may lead to a permanent ban.
+Community Impact: Demonstrating a pattern of violation of community +standards, including sustained inappropriate behavior, harassment of an +individual, or aggression toward or disparagement of classes of individuals.
+Consequence: A permanent ban from any sort of public interaction within +the community.
+This Code of Conduct is adapted from the Contributor Covenant, +version 2.0, available at +https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/0/code_of_conduct.html.
+Community Impact Guidelines were inspired by Mozilla's code of conduct +enforcement ladder.
+For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see the FAQ at +https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq. Translations are available at +https://www.contributor-covenant.org/translations.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +Thanks for considering to contribute and reading this!
+Here we discuss how to contribute
+Spoken text are ideas, feedback, messages, etc. and are written in English.
+For ideas or feedback, create an +Issue. +These Issues will be discussed in a meeting and/or below that Issue.
+Ideas that improve the experience of our learners +will likely be accepted.
+We welcome any contribution that:
+As an UPPMAX contributor, one can contribute by:
+mainAs an external contributor, one can contribute by:
+main branch is fine :-)NBIS teaches, among others, bioinformatics courses, which are +evaluated with an anonymous survey sent its learners. +However, there is discussion in how good/useful the survey's +evaluation questions are. +Upon reading the literature on how these questions +were crafted and selected, +one concludes that no selection criterium has been written down. +This paper is the first to transparently show the crafting and +selection of evaluation questions to be used for NBIS evaluation, +being the 'future work' as mentioned in its paper most important to this topic.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +