From bf636aede41f7a5cbc1aa6cb1d68fb15302fec6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: richelbilderbeek Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:11:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix spelling --- docs/introduction.md | 2 +- docs/methods.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/introduction.md b/docs/introduction.md index bb17693..11b8e26 100644 --- a/docs/introduction.md +++ b/docs/introduction.md @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ where the literature is searched for how these questions came to be and by which criteria the best were selected, in the hope of establishing the usefulness of this survey. -Besides disussing the current survey question, +Besides discussing the current survey question, this paper is the first to give a fully transparent process on how, with the same goals in mind, a similar set of evaluation questions were developed diff --git a/docs/methods.md b/docs/methods.md index aa04d3c..d6cfc1f 100644 --- a/docs/methods.md +++ b/docs/methods.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ A literature search is performed to find out the history of the current ELIXIR evaluation questions, -with a focus on answering the subquestions: +with a focus on answering the following sub-questions: - How were these evaluation questions developed? - By which criteria where the best questions selected?