Fix spelling

NBISweden · Feb 14, 2025 · eae8e95 · eae8e95
1 parent 25da046
commit eae8e95
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 3 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions.
diff --git a/docs/conclusion.md b/docs/conclusion.md
@@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ The criteria for neither not copying questions for the earlier
 questionnaires, not for adding adding questions were not written down.
 
 As none of these evaluations describe the process on how questions
-were developed, it comes as no surpise that neither
+were developed, it comes as no surprise that neither
 evaluation refers to evidence-based best practices in the literature.
 
 ## RQ2: Can the current ELIXIR evaluation questions be criticized?
 
-The mandatory ELIXIR evalution question with the goal of evaluating
+The mandatory ELIXIR evaluation questions with the goal of evaluating
 course quality can be criticized, with
 
 - 1 question that can be answered before taking the course (question 5)
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ course quality can be criticized, with
 
 ## RQ3: Which ELIXIR evaluation questions are concluded from a fully transparent process?
 
-<!-- markdownlint-enable MD013 --><!-- Headings cannot be split up over lines, hence will break 80 characters per line -->
+<!-- markdownlint-enable MD013 -->
 
 `TODO`
 

diff --git a/docs/discussion.md b/docs/discussion.md
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ between the answers on these two questions.
 
 Regarding these two questions, however, only one is modestly supported
 by the literature ('Would you recommend the course?'),
-where the other ('How satisfied are you with the coure?')
+where the other ('How satisfied are you with the course?')
 has strong support against it. Note that the former question came
-from the Data Carpentries questionnaire (as descibed
+from the Data Carpentries questionnaire (as described
 in `[Jordan et al., 2018]`), where the latter has been added by ELIXIR.
 
 

diff --git a/docs/results_2.md b/docs/results_2.md
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Question 8 too attempts to measure course quality by asking the learner
 to rate it.
 This question is absent from the two
 questionnaires (i.e. those described in `[Brazas & Ouellette, 2016]`
-and `[Jordan et al., 2018]`) this questionairre is based one.
+and `[Jordan et al., 2018]`) this questionnaire is based one.
 
 There seems to be overlap between this and previous
 question, hinged on the assumption that if a course is recommended