From eae8e95c795428183dcc44f5bb7b20ebd1b8888c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: richelbilderbeek Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:11:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix spelling --- docs/conclusion.md | 6 +++--- docs/discussion.md | 4 ++-- docs/results_2.md | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/conclusion.md b/docs/conclusion.md index cfa645e..2d8921f 100644 --- a/docs/conclusion.md +++ b/docs/conclusion.md @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ The criteria for neither not copying questions for the earlier questionnaires, not for adding adding questions were not written down. As none of these evaluations describe the process on how questions -were developed, it comes as no surpise that neither +were developed, it comes as no surprise that neither evaluation refers to evidence-based best practices in the literature. ## RQ2: Can the current ELIXIR evaluation questions be criticized? -The mandatory ELIXIR evalution question with the goal of evaluating +The mandatory ELIXIR evaluation questions with the goal of evaluating course quality can be criticized, with - 1 question that can be answered before taking the course (question 5) @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ course quality can be criticized, with ## RQ3: Which ELIXIR evaluation questions are concluded from a fully transparent process? - + `TODO` diff --git a/docs/discussion.md b/docs/discussion.md index 4e3b0c6..9c0b266 100644 --- a/docs/discussion.md +++ b/docs/discussion.md @@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ between the answers on these two questions. Regarding these two questions, however, only one is modestly supported by the literature ('Would you recommend the course?'), -where the other ('How satisfied are you with the coure?') +where the other ('How satisfied are you with the course?') has strong support against it. Note that the former question came -from the Data Carpentries questionnaire (as descibed +from the Data Carpentries questionnaire (as described in `[Jordan et al., 2018]`), where the latter has been added by ELIXIR. diff --git a/docs/results_2.md b/docs/results_2.md index f79514e..bd9c80b 100644 --- a/docs/results_2.md +++ b/docs/results_2.md @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Question 8 too attempts to measure course quality by asking the learner to rate it. This question is absent from the two questionnaires (i.e. those described in `[Brazas & Ouellette, 2016]` -and `[Jordan et al., 2018]`) this questionairre is based one. +and `[Jordan et al., 2018]`) this questionnaire is based one. There seems to be overlap between this and previous question, hinged on the assumption that if a course is recommended