Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Why no self-afficacy measures?
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
richelbilderbeek committed Feb 13, 2025
1 parent 66b0a5d commit fc4086b
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 17 additions and 3 deletions.
Binary file added docs/plaza_et_al_2002_fig.png
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
20 changes: 17 additions & 3 deletions docs/results_1.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -108,13 +108,18 @@ Neither does the referred literature:

Taking a closer look at the evaluation questions of `[Jordan et al., 2018]`,
we see that some questions of its questions were not used.
The reasoning behind this is absent in `[Gurwitz et al., 2020]`.

One such removed evaluation question is to let learners self-assess
their confidence in learning outcomes.

???- question "How does such a question look like?"

Here is an example of questions to let learners self-assess
themselves (from `[Plaza et al., 2002]`):

![Figure from Plaza et al., 2002](plaza_et_al_2002_fig.png)

???- question "How are the analysing such questions look like?"

Here we can see the results of learners self-assessing
their competences before and after the teaching session,
figure from `[Jordan et al., 2018]`:
Expand All @@ -129,10 +134,15 @@ their confidence in learning outcomes.
We know that this self-assessment does not relate to actual
skill `[Liaw et al., 2012]` (with more studies showing this in that paper).
However, there is some evidence that self-assessment

Check failure on line 136 in docs/results_1.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / check_markdown

Trailing spaces [Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1]
does correlate to teacher effectiveness `[Raupach et al., 2011]`,
is informative to evaluate a course curriculum `[Plaza et al., 2002]`
and teacher effectiveness `[Raupach et al., 2011]`,
although other studies argue that more measurements are needed to
properly assess teacher effectiveness `[Darling‐Hammond et al., 2010]`.

Why ELIXIR chose to not use this instrument of evaluating
is not described in the paper in which it announced the
evaluation questions `[Gurwitz et al., 2020]`.

## References

- `[Ang et al., 2018]` Ang, Lawrence, Yvonne Alexandra Breyer, and Joseph Pitt.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -168,3 +178,7 @@ properly assess teacher effectiveness `[Darling‐Hammond et al., 2010]`.
Raupach, Tobias, et al. "Towards outcome-based programme evaluation:
using student comparative self-assessments to determine teaching
effectiveness." Medical teacher 33.8 (2011): e446-e453.
- `[Plaza et al., 2002]`
Plaza, Cecilia M., et al.

Check failure on line 182 in docs/results_1.md

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / check_markdown

Trailing spaces [Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1]
"Curricular evaluation using self-efficacy measurements."
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 66.1 (2002): 51-54.

0 comments on commit fc4086b

Please sign in to comment.