Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Localisation #387

Merged
merged 58 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
58 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
45f9338
edit: title
nap84 Jan 30, 2024
581e399
add: rough draft of all standards
nap84 Jan 30, 2024
0c18fe0
edit: section title
nap84 Jan 30, 2024
b17d381
re-organize
nap84 Feb 19, 2024
8c7060c
fix: nicer arrows
nap84 Apr 15, 2024
727dcff
fix: small things and notes
nap84 Apr 15, 2024
36acb5c
add: sec on dataset -> article link
nap84 Apr 15, 2024
e837a16
re-worked: repos
nap84 Apr 16, 2024
aec82bf
edit: additions to publishers and journals
nap84 Apr 16, 2024
361a027
add: crossref info to author/linking datasets sections
nap84 Apr 16, 2024
e5b4638
proof read: section repos
nap84 Apr 16, 2024
ff85dd7
add: rough draft of all standards
nap84 Jan 30, 2024
69c824c
re-organize
nap84 Feb 19, 2024
8e434ed
fix: nicer arrows
nap84 Apr 15, 2024
a7407cf
fix: small things and notes
nap84 Apr 15, 2024
2b53f52
add: sec on dataset -> article link
nap84 Apr 15, 2024
639379a
re-worked: repos
nap84 Apr 16, 2024
1bfa13b
edit: additions to publishers and journals
nap84 Apr 16, 2024
6bef6f9
add: crossref info to author/linking datasets sections
nap84 Apr 16, 2024
f81fdb9
proof read: section repos
nap84 Apr 16, 2024
c0d3830
fix: category json
tilfischer Jun 6, 2024
3644933
fix: for research infrastructure providers
tilfischer Jun 7, 2024
8f78afe
fix: remove CC0
tilfischer Jun 7, 2024
e19c63f
feat: headlines standards for infrastructure
tilfischer Jun 7, 2024
8383298
fix: pub standards, infrastructure, typo
tilfischer Jun 7, 2024
8e74eba
feat/fix: for publishers and journals
tilfischer Jun 11, 2024
69855cf
feat: move publisher up
tilfischer Jun 11, 2024
cfb1345
fix: removed DOI registration for under review
tilfischer Jun 11, 2024
e937ce7
fix: typo
tilfischer Jun 11, 2024
77e12c5
feat/fix: pub standards, for authors
tilfischer Jun 12, 2024
819418a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into pub-standards-collection
jliermann Jun 12, 2024
b5ccdc0
Merge branch 'pub-standards-collection' into pub-standards-collection
jliermann Jun 12, 2024
6407d4d
Merge pull request #367 from tilfischer/pub-standards-collection
jliermann Jun 12, 2024
937dcdf
feat: more standards
tilfischer Jun 12, 2024
ff13cdf
Merge branch 'pub-standards-collection' of https://github.com/tilfisc…
tilfischer Jun 12, 2024
13807a9
Merge branch 'pub-standards-collection' of https://github.com/tilfisc…
tilfischer Jun 12, 2024
f1bd0d2
feat: pub std, orcid, ror, bagit, ro-crate
tilfischer Jun 12, 2024
cd8e96d
Merge pull request #368 from tilfischer/pub-standards-collection
nap84 Jun 12, 2024
a052699
edit: small en fix
nap84 Jul 17, 2024
e2a0cb8
edited for authors section
nap84 Jul 17, 2024
39c8df5
Proofreding/edits
nap84 Jul 18, 2024
92e340f
feat: split pub standards page by stakeholders
tilfischer Jul 19, 2024
f2c7124
feat: sorting section data publishing
tilfischer Jul 19, 2024
8d1ce74
Merge branch 'pub-standards-collection' of https://github.com/tilfisc…
tilfischer Jul 19, 2024
ad5bb1c
fix: git fail. added Nikkis edits
tilfischer Jul 19, 2024
6d4b839
fix: clean up sorting within data pub section
tilfischer Jul 19, 2024
c523f3d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into pub-standards-collection
jliermann Jul 22, 2024
c763501
Merge branch 'pub-standards-collection' of https://github.com/tilfisc…
jliermann Jul 22, 2024
9e6321a
Revert "fix: clean up sorting within data pub section"
jliermann Jul 22, 2024
ddd5998
Revert "feat: sorting section data publishing"
jliermann Jul 22, 2024
e02f101
fix: removed double main headlines pub standards
tilfischer Jul 23, 2024
cbb91f3
fix: added "For" from dublicate headling pub std
tilfischer Jul 23, 2024
7ab93d2
feat: move up pub std in nav bar
tilfischer Jul 23, 2024
1a83914
Merge pull request #384 from tilfischer/pub-standards-collection
jliermann Jul 23, 2024
bab1527
Merge pull request #385 from NFDI4Chem/pub-standards-collection
jliermann Jul 23, 2024
767c9cc
Update 30_licenses.mdx
Ted-Bender Jul 24, 2024
9c7e502
fix: localisation issue
jliermann Jul 24, 2024
335e27b
Merge pull request #386 from Ted-Bender/main
jliermann Jul 25, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
28 changes: 17 additions & 11 deletions docs/50_data_publication/00_data_publishing.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ slug: "/data_publishing"
id: "data_publishing"
---

import useBaseUrl from '@docusaurus/useBaseUrl';
import useBaseUrl from "@docusaurus/useBaseUrl";

# Data Publishing

Expand All @@ -14,17 +14,22 @@ This page applies to all researchers who want to publish their data.

## Motivation

In chemical research, we strive to share results with others, commonly through articles in renowned scientific journals. To be able to actually work with and build upon these results, the scientific community also requires the data that the results were based on.
In chemical research, we strive to share results with others, commonly through articles in renowned scientific journals. To be able to actually work with and build upon these results, the scientific community also requires the data that the results were based on.

Publishing and therefore sharing these chemistry research data in a [FAIR](/docs/fair) manner by considering aspects such as [persistent identifiers](/docs/pid/), rich [metadata](/docs/metadata), [provenance information](/docs/provenance/), [data formats standards](/docs/format_standards) for analytical data, information on the [license](/docs/licenses/) applied, and by providing [machine-readable chemical structures](/docs/machine-readable_chemical_structures) adds value to the research results and enables discovery and reuse.
Publishing and therefore sharing these chemistry research data in a [FAIR](/docs/fair) manner by considering aspects such as [persistent identifiers](/docs/pid/), rich [metadata](/docs/metadata), [provenance information](/docs/provenance/), [data formats standards](/docs/format_standards) for analytical data, information on the [license](/docs/licenses/) applied, and by providing [machine-readable chemical structures](/docs/machine-readable_chemical_structures) adds value to the research results and enables discovery and reuse.

To publish data is essential to ensure that findings are transparent and reproducible. Moreover, it prevents duplicate efforts to generate data, hence, data publishing is also a measure of sustainability.

## Benefits of data publishing

There are direct benefits for researchers who publish their data. Data publications increase your career recognition, enable new collaborations, and provide a citation advantage compared to articles without an associated and linked dataset in a research data repository.

<img align="center" src={useBaseUrl('/img/data_pub/data_publication_brian_hole_CC_BY_40.png')} alt="Data Publication Brian Hole CC BY 4.0" width="80%" />
<img
align="center"
src={useBaseUrl("/img/data_pub/data_publication_brian_hole_CC_BY_40.png")}
alt="Data Publication Brian Hole CC BY 4.0"
width="80%"
/>

(Source: Brian Hole, [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), [Slideshare](https://www.slideshare.net/brianhole/the-journal-of-open-archaeology-data-and-prime-incentivising-open-data-archiving))

Expand All @@ -34,8 +39,8 @@ Additionally, the research community benefits here as, for example, new research

There are two main ways to publish research data:

- publish data in a [research data repository](/docs/repositories/)
- publish a separate [data article](/docs/data_articles/) with the corresponding dataset published in a [research data repository](/docs/repositories/)
- publish data in a [research data repository](/docs/repositories/)
- publish a separate [data article](/docs/data_articles/) with the corresponding dataset published in a [research data repository](/docs/repositories/)

:::info Info:
Field-specific repositories should be the first choice as these repositories enhance the FAIRness of data on behalf of the submitters. To retain the same level of FAIRness, data publishing in generic repositories requires manual FAIRification.
Expand All @@ -53,10 +58,11 @@ Still confused about how to publish chemistry data? We do provide a consulting a

## Sources and further information

- [The citation advantage of linking publications to research data](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230416)
- [NSF Public Access Plan 2.0](https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/2023-06/NSF23104.pdf)
- [DFG Code of Conduct, Guideline 13: Providing public access to research results](https://wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de/en/code-of-conduct/providing-public-access-to-research-results/)
- [How does Open Science practice differ between research disciplines?](https://theplosblog.plos.org/2023/07/open-science-by-discipline/)
- [The citation advantage of linking publications to research data](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230416)
- [NSF Public Access Plan 2.0](https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/2023-06/NSF23104.pdf)
- [DFG Code of Conduct, Guideline 13: Providing public access to research results](https://wissenschaftliche-integritaet.de/en/code-of-conduct/providing-public-access-to-research-results/)
- [How does Open Science practice differ between research disciplines?](https://theplosblog.plos.org/2023/07/open-science-by-discipline/)

---

----
Main authors: [ORCID:0000-0002-6243-2840](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6243-2840) and [ORCID:0000-0003-4480-8661](https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4480-8661)
12 changes: 6 additions & 6 deletions docs/50_data_publication/30_licenses.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,13 +7,13 @@ import useBaseUrl from "@docusaurus/useBaseUrl";

# Licenses

This page is currently still under construction.
In order to provide you with some helpful information, we have compiled introductory links on this topic.

In order to provide you with some helpful information until completion, we have compiled introductory links on this topic.

- There is a brief overview of [choosing an open license](https://heidiseibold.ck.page/posts/choosing-an-open-license) as a researcher.
- If you want to delve deeper into the topic of Creative Commons, you will find a good [overview](https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/) with all the necessary information here
- And for a comprehensive overview for chemists, you can read this [article by Thomas Hartmann](https://books.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/heibooks/catalog/book/979/chapter/13728) (in german)
- [**Choosing an open license**](https://heidiseibold.ck.page/posts/choosing-an-open-license) as a researcher - overview.
- [**Creative Commons overview**](https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/)
- [**Comprehensive overview for chemists**](https://books.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/heibooks/catalog/book/979/chapter/13728) (in german)
- **[Publishing research data](https://forschungsdaten.info/themen/rechte-und-pflichten/forschungsdaten-veroeffentlichen/)** (in german)
- **[Open Data Commons](https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/)**



Expand Down
35 changes: 0 additions & 35 deletions docs/50_data_publication/70_publication_standards.mdx

This file was deleted.

Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
---
title: "For Authors"
slug: "/publishing_standards_authors"
---

### Use ORCID iD to Identifiy Authors and ROR to Identifiy Institutions

:::tip Standard
_Authors should provide their ORCID iD to identify the authors/creators and contributors, and their ROR identifier to identify the institution to which they are affiliated._
:::

ORCID iDs allow authors to be uniquely identified, whereas author names may not be unique, may change, or may have different ordering conventions depending on cultural differences. Similarly, affiliations can vary according to style and granularity. In order to uniquely identify the institutions to which authors are affiliated, the ROR identifier should be provided. Please note that the ROR identifier is not intended to resolve down to the departmental level. Nevertheless, both identifiers improve findability.

### How to use Dataset PIDs in Scientific Articles

During deposition of research data, a [persistent identifier (PID)](/docs/pid) is assigned to the data. Authors should use PIDs in their scientific article for interlinking and referencing in **two main ways**:

#### How to use Dataset PIDs of own Datasets in Scientific articles

:::tip Standard
_Authors should add the PID of their corresponding dataset(s) to the data availability statement and should add PIDs of dataset(s) to the reference section in order to specifically cite dataset(s)._
:::

For corresponding data, i.e. directly underlying the results reported in the article, add the PID to the article's [data availability statement](/docs/data_availability_statement), or a similarly termed section. In order to specifically reference and cite your data within the text, add your dataset to the references as well.

:::danger Notice:
This distinction is important, because **the link** to the dataset in CrossRef's DOI metadata of scientific articles **is differently set**, depending on whether the dataset is a directly related source of information or a specifically referenced resource.
:::

#### How to use Dataset PIDs for Datasets by other Researchers in Scientific articles

:::tip Standard
_Authors should include PIDs for datasets published by other researchers that have been reused in the references, rather than citing the corresponding article._
:::

For datasets published by other researchers and reused in a study, include the dataset PID in the reference section of the manuscript and cite within the text accordingly.

### How to Link Datasets to their Corresponding Scientific Article

:::tip Standard
_Researchers should link their datasets to be published to their corresponding articles by adding the article DOI to the dataset's DataCite metadata as a related identifier._
:::

Research data repositories offer the option to add a related identifier to link datasets to related resources, such as a corresponding article. This considerably enhances the [FAIRness](/docs/fair/) of datasets, mainly the findability ([F2](/docs/fair/#f2-data-are-described-with-rich-metadata-defined-by-r1-below)) as well as the interoperability ([I3](/docs/fair/#i3-metadata-include-qualified-references-to-other-metadata)).

### Usage of Relation Type for Linking Datasets with Scientific Articles

:::tip Standard
_Researchers should link their datasets to be published to their corresponding articles using the relation type `IsSupplementTo`._
:::

According to the [DataCite Metadata Schema](https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.5/appendices/appendix-1/relationType/), [`IsCitedBy`](https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.5/appendices/appendix-1/relationType/#iscitedby) and [`IsSupplementTo`](https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.5/appendices/appendix-1/relationType/#issupplementto) are both recommended for discovery. For published articles, [CrossRef's documentation on relationships](https://www.crossref.org/documentation/schema-library/markup-guide-metadata-segments/relationships/) recommends that `isSupplmenetTo` should be used to link datasets generated as part of research results.

### Usage of Collection DOIs

:::tip Standard
_Researchers should use the Collection DOI provided by a repository in the data availability statements of their corresponding manuscript to wrap research data objects that are relevant to that of an article to be published._
:::

Field-specific research data repositories may provide DOIs to reference individual chemical reactions, molecules, and their analytical data. Generic, multidisciplinary research data repositories provide DOIs for a whole published datasets, while more than one published dataset may be relevant to study results published via an article. In other words, many DOIs may be relevant to a published article, whereas **a data availability statement may provide some DOIs but not many DOIs**.

To facilitate the process of manuscript submission and article publication, researchers should add the **Collection DOI** provided by the repository to the data availability statement. This will ensure that all data underlying a published manuscript can be linked to an article in the data availability statement and the CrossRef metadata of that article.

If individual reactions, molecules, or analytical data should be referenced, add the DOIs of these individual research objects to the reference section and cite within the text accordingly.

---

Main authors: [ORCID:0000-0003-4480-8661](https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4480-8661), [ORCID: 0000-0002-6243-2840](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6243-2840)
Loading
Loading