fix: 使用innerHTML赋值后转小程序时，a标签转view标签+img转image标签时，把width和height写入style属性【latest】

[zhengyanan1]

这个 PR 做了什么? (简要描述所做更改)

1. 对于innerHTML生成的小程序, a=>text 变成 a=>view
2. 对于innerHTML生成的小程序, img=>image时，如果有width和height，把这2个值写入style属性内

这个 PR 是什么类型? (至少选择一个)

• 错误修复(Bugfix) issue: fix #
• 新功能(Feature)
• 代码重构(Refactor)
• TypeScript 类型定义修改(Typings)
• 文档修改(Docs)
• 代码风格更新(Code style update)
• 其他，请描述(Other, please describe):

这个 PR 涉及以下平台:

• 所有小程序
• 微信小程序
• 支付宝小程序
• 百度小程序
• 字节跳动小程序
• QQ 轻应用
• 京东小程序
• 快应用平台（QuickApp）
• Web 平台（H5）
• 移动端（React-Native）
• 鸿蒙（harmony）

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 58.50%. Comparing base (c17123d) to head (b81a8f9).
Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...taro-runtime/src/dom-external/inner-html/parser.ts	10.00%	9 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (25.00%) is below the target coverage (75.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16781      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.52%   58.50%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         466      466              
  Lines       27099    27109      +10     
  Branches     5908     5959      +51     
==========================================
+ Hits        15860    15861       +1     
+ Misses       9895     9773     -122     
- Partials     1344     1475     +131     

Flag	Coverage Δ
taro-cli	73.67% <ø> (ø)
taro-runtime	59.47% <25.00%> (-0.40%)	⬇️
taro-web	52.68% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...s/taro-runtime/src/dom-external/inner-html/tags.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...taro-runtime/src/dom-external/inner-html/parser.ts	75.16% <10.00%> (-4.56%)	⬇️

... and 20 files with indirect coverage changes

[skyclouds2001]

这个和 #16780 冲突了吧