You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
CESM3 has / planned to calculate all GHG prognostically. Should we do the same for NorESM.
This is can be done either by full ghg cycles including emissions, but also by nudged surface concentrations and prescribed loss rates. Increases the number of tracers by 5.
Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
No response
Will this change (regression test) answers?
Yes
Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?
No
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
CESM3 has / planned to calculate all GHG prognostically. Should we do the same for NorESM.
This is can be done either by full ghg cycles including emissions, but also by nudged surface concentrations and prescribed loss rates. Increases the number of tracers by 5.
Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
No response
Will this change (regression test) answers?
Yes
Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?
No
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: