-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added EDAM ontology #41
Conversation
annefou
commented
Jul 22, 2020
- Used https://ifb-elixirfr.github.io/edam-browser/ and added EDAM ontology for each Galaxy climate tool.
- Updated contributing guidelines to make sure we don't forget to add EDAM ontologies.
make sure we know that ADAM ontologies need to be added when creating a new tool
tools/psy-maps/psy-maps.xml
Outdated
@@ -212,4 +212,11 @@ psyplot and psy-maps can be found at https://psyplot.readthedocs.io/projects/psy | |||
]]></help> | |||
<citations> | |||
</citations> | |||
<edam_topics> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, the IUC guidelines recommend to put those sections on top: https://galaxy-iuc-standards.readthedocs.io/en/latest/best_practices/tool_xml.html?highlight=order#coding-style
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ooops :(
When we discussed it this winter for the IUC tools @bgruening, I remember you suggested to put it next to the citations (also xrefs), in the order of xrefs, edam_topics, edam_operations, citations. Which is also what I've been following. And I also think that makes sense, having all the IDs/links together. More thoughts?
So change the docs (PR #58), or redo how we've been annotating so far?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. I moved them at the top... At least it is consistent with the documentation!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @matuskalas. Yeah, currently I just stick to IUC guideline. Thanks for bringing up the topic on IUC - the correct place to discuss this!
- [Physics](https://ifb-elixirfr.github.io/edam-browser/#topic_3318) (topic_3318) | ||
|
||
We may need to update all the tools later when additional topics will be added for geosciences. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🥇 Beautiful doc! 🥇
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent idea. I installed firefox on my laptop to get it; I did not managed to install it with chrome. And it is definitely great! Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@annefou if you feel like it please add those tipps and instructions to IUC and any other repo that you find :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I'll add an issue in IUC and make a PR. Thanks for your suggestion.
<edam_operations> | ||
<edam_operation>operation_2238</edam_operation> | ||
<edam_operation>operation_3432</edam_operation> | ||
<edam_operation>operation_0573</edam_operation> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This Map drawing concept is unfortunately messy in EDAM, because it's defined only as "DNA" map drawing (Is that an established term?). So TODO for EDAM, to add either a generic or a geographical Map drawing concept, but then also review all the usage of this concept in bio.tools (looks like it will need even more map-creating concepts), Debian, Galaxy, etc. So great to keep using it here for now (🥇@annefou) as a placeholder, but we'll need to update it in the future, when EDAM is improved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes of course... I did not think about it! For me a map is always a geographical map!!!
- [Physics](https://ifb-elixirfr.github.io/edam-browser/#topic_3318) (topic_3318) | ||
|
||
We may need to update all the tools later when additional topics will be added for geosciences. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
EDAM section should be at the top after description.
works on firefox (did not work for me on chrome) and it is very useful.