From d6a39458b3fe65a90e23a6ddbc4a16e17be6d8fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Quarto GHA Workflow Runner Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 18:20:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Built site for gh-pages --- .nojekyll | 2 +- index.html | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/.nojekyll b/.nojekyll index f787dd8..4819c3d 100644 --- a/.nojekyll +++ b/.nojekyll @@ -1 +1 @@ -eef5fb95 \ No newline at end of file +bc4c7d49 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 96e85c9..5d5e83a 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -5622,8 +5622,8 @@

Risk Assessment of R Packages at Novartis

ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
-
- +
+
@@ -5636,7 +5636,7 @@

Risk assessment tim

The package versions reported here are the versions of the package installed in the R module on the SCE, which may be a slightly later version of the package than that originally assessed.

We conducted an analysis of changes in risk assessment ratings over time and found that the risk rating changed in only minority of packages (7.4%). In these small number of cases the changes were primarily non-impactful, e.g. a package transitioning from medium risk to low risk, with changes primarily driven by fluctuation in download rates. These data helped inform our strategy for the risk assessment of existing packages - we re-assess the risk for major milestones like updates to the R version but for more incremental releases we carry over the risk assessment from the previous release.

-

More information about this analysis can be found in these slides, presented at an R Validation Hub community meeting on 20th August 2024.

+

More information about this analysis can be found in these slides, presented at an R Validation Hub community meeting on 20th August 2024.

Risk ratings