[16.0] [MIG] stock_barcodes #587

FranzPoize · 2024-02-28T17:59:55Z

No description provided.

angelmoya · 2024-03-01T08:24:45Z

Functional testing:

Set Barcode options:

Set this barcode option on incoming picking type.

Configura one product tracking as serial number.

Purchase this product to create a incoming picking.

Go to incoming picking and get this error trying to open barcode interface:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/opt/odoo/odoo/http.py", line 1633, in _serve_db
return service_model.retrying(self._serve_ir_http, self.env)
File "/opt/odoo/odoo/service/model.py", line 133, in retrying
result = func()
File "/opt/odoo/odoo/http.py", line 1660, in _serve_ir_http
response = self.dispatcher.dispatch(rule.endpoint, args)
File "/opt/odoo/odoo/http.py", line 1864, in dispatch
result = self.request.registry['ir.http']._dispatch(endpoint)
File "/opt/odoo/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_http.py", line 154, in _dispatch
result = endpoint(**request.params)
File "/opt/odoo/odoo/http.py", line 697, in route_wrapper
result = endpoint(self, *args, **params_ok)
File "/opt/odoo/addons/web/controllers/dataset.py", line 46, in call_button
action = self._call_kw(model, method, args, kwargs)
File "/opt/odoo/addons/web/controllers/dataset.py", line 33, in _call_kw
return call_kw(request.env[model], method, args, kwargs)
File "/opt/odoo/odoo/api.py", line 468, in call_kw
result = _call_kw_multi(method, model, args, kwargs)
File "/opt/odoo/odoo/api.py", line 453, in _call_kw_multi
result = method(recs, *args, **kwargs)
File "/mnt/data/odoo-addons-dir/stock_barcodes/models/stock_picking.py", line 35, in action_barcode_scan
wiz.determine_todo_action()
File "/mnt/data/odoo-addons-dir/stock_barcodes/wizard/stock_barcodes_read_picking.py", line 188, in determine_todo_action
self.fill_todo_records()
File "/mnt/data/odoo-addons-dir/stock_barcodes/wizard/stock_barcodes_read_picking.py", line 181, in fill_todo_records
self.env["wiz.stock.barcodes.read.todo"].fill_records(self, [move_lines])
File "/mnt/data/odoo-addons-dir/stock_barcodes/wizard/stock_barcodes_read_todo.py", line 163, in fill_records
todo_vals[key] = self._prepare_fill_record_values(
File "/mnt/data/odoo-addons-dir/stock_barcodes/wizard/stock_barcodes_read_todo.py", line 88, in _prepare_fill_record_values
"product_uom_qty": line.product_uom_qty,
AttributeError: 'stock.move.line' object has no attribute 'product_uom_qty'

chienandalu

Hi @FranzPoize Thanks for your work here.

I didn't go deep into the python logic, although it looks correct at first sight.

As a general comment, I'm finding hard to review the changes in the javascript logic:

There are no diffs
There's missing documentation from the former code and for the new it isn't explained.
There are overrides that copy the original method (a thus the inheritance is broken for those)

Some more specific comments:

chienandalu · 2024-04-02T15:03:02Z

stock_barcodes/__manifest__.py

    "author": "Tecnativa, " "Odoo Community Association (OCA)",
    "website": "https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-barcode",
    "license": "AGPL-3",
    "category": "Extra Tools",
-    "depends": ["barcodes", "stock", "web_widget_numeric_step"],
+    "depends": ["barcodes", "stock", "web_widget_numeric_step", "web"],


web_widget_numeric_step already depends on web

chienandalu · 2024-04-02T15:13:16Z

stock_barcodes/wizard/stock_barcodes_read_picking_views.xml

+                                                </div>
+                                                <div class="col-2">
+                                                    <span
+                                                        class="pull-right text-right text-muted"


Review your bootstrap classes as they should be migrated to BS5: https://getbootstrap.com/docs/5.0/migration/

You've got some tooling in openupgradelib to analyze your view code: https://github.com/OCA/openupgradelib/blob/master/openupgradelib/openupgrade_160.py

chienandalu · 2024-04-02T15:21:25Z

stock_barcodes/static/src/barcodes_models_utils.esm.js

+/* Copyright 2022 Tecnativa - Alexandre D. Díaz
+ * License AGPL-3.0 or later (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl). */
+
+const barcodeModels = [


Suggested change

const barcodeModels = [

export const barcodeModels = [

Yes thank you !

chienandalu · 2024-04-02T15:23:19Z

stock_barcodes/static/src/barcodes_models_utils.esm.js

+];
+
+export function isAllowedBarcodeModel(modelName) {
+    return barcodeModels.indexOf(modelName) !== -1;


A little bit more expressive:

Suggested change

return barcodeModels.indexOf(modelName) !== -1;

return barcodeModels.includes(modelName);

Thank you ! Changed

chienandalu · 2024-04-02T15:26:59Z

stock_barcodes/static/src/barcodes_models_utils.esm.js

Organize these source files at leat in functionality folders so it's more clear where to look what

Tried to. Tell me if you thinks that's better

chienandalu · 2024-04-02T15:27:50Z

stock_barcodes/static/src/barcodes_models_utils.esm.js

+    "wiz.stock.barcodes.read.todo",
+];
+
+export function isAllowedBarcodeModel(modelName) {


This also had a docstring

chienandalu · 2024-04-02T15:31:52Z

stock_barcodes/static/src/boolean_toggle.esm.js

+import {registry} from "@web/core/registry";
+
+class BarcodeBooleanToggleField extends BooleanToggleField {
+    onChange(newValue) {


Missing documentation from the original here as well where it was stated why this was needed...

chienandalu · 2024-04-02T15:34:56Z

stock_barcodes/static/src/form_view.esm.js

+import {patch} from "@web/core/utils/patch";
+
+patch(FormController.prototype, "Allow display.controlPanel overriding", {
+    setup() {


Docs missing here as well

chienandalu · 2024-04-02T15:56:22Z

stock_barcodes/static/src/kanban_renderer.esm.js

+    // eslint-disable-next-line complexity
+    focusNextCard(area, direction) {
+        const {isGrouped} = this.props.list;
+        const closestCard = document.activeElement.closest(".o_kanban_record");
+        if (!closestCard) {
+            return;
+        }
+        const groups = isGrouped
+            ? [...area.querySelectorAll(".o_kanban_group")]
+            : [area];
+        let cards = [...groups]
+            .map((group) => [...group.querySelectorAll(".o_kanban_record")])
+            .filter((group) => group.length);
+
+        if (isAllowedBarcodeModel(this.props.list.resModel)) {


Why do yo need to copy the whole method if you're returning in the middle of it? Maybe you have to repeat some of it if it's encapsulated, but in the end you should try to return super. Just evaluate this first, and repeat as less as possible

The code is not returning in the if statement it's recomputing the cards variable.
I could call super and return its value but I would still have duplicate that code because nothing is returned from the parent function. I still need to compute the candidate cards still filter them and focus the correct one.

If you have a way to do it better I would need more information because I'm not sure how to go about it.

chienandalu · 2024-04-02T15:57:58Z

stock_barcodes/static/src/kanban_renderer.esm.js

+        const rootRef = useRef("root");
+        useHotkey(
+            "Enter",


What's the purpose of this?

Not sure what you're referring to ? the rootRef or the useHotkey ?

FranzPoize · 2024-04-03T15:10:51Z

Thank you @chienandalu for your review

There are no diffs

Yes unfortunately the differences in behavior between the legacy front and owl are truly unreconcialable...
First of all the file name are changed to use the new odoo-module.
Also for example most of the logic for hotkey management was in kanban renderer. In the new frontend there can be many kanban renderer instances which would have registered their own global management of hotkey this needed to be completely refactored.

There's missing documentation from the former code and for the new it isn't explained.

I hope it's fixed in the latest push

There are overrides that copy the original method (a thus the inheritance is broken for those)

Yes that is not inevitable but is the least ugly way to do what needs to be done I'll go in more detail in the review comment

chienandalu

Thanks @FranzPoize take also in consideration that there are lots of recent changes in the 15.0 that should be included as a base to the migration as well...

chienandalu

Also testing a manual entry, I found this error

File "/opt/odoo/auto/addons/stock_barcodes/wizard/stock_barcodes_read.py", line 744, in action_confirm
    res = self.action_done()
  File "/opt/odoo/auto/addons/stock_barcodes/wizard/stock_barcodes_read_picking.py", line 269, in action_done
    ).action_done()
  File "/opt/odoo/auto/addons/stock_barcodes/wizard/stock_barcodes_read.py", line 547, in action_done
    if not self.check_done_conditions():
  File "/opt/odoo/auto/addons/stock_barcodes/wizard/stock_barcodes_read_picking.py", line 670, in check_done_conditions
    and float_compare(
  File "/opt/odoo/custom/src/odoo/odoo/tools/float_utils.py", line 155, in float_compare
    rounding_factor = _float_check_precision(precision_digits=precision_digits,
  File "/opt/odoo/custom/src/odoo/odoo/tools/float_utils.py", line 29, in _float_check_precision
    assert precision_rounding is None or precision_rounding > 0,\
AssertionError: precision_rounding must be positive, got 0.0

The above server error caused the following client error:
RPC_ERROR: Odoo Server Error
    at makeErrorFromResponse (http://localhost:16069/web/assets/3930-e51fdb0/web.assets_backend.min.js:993:163)
    at XMLHttpRequest.<anonymous> (http://localhost:16069/web/assets/3930-e51fdb0/web.assets_backend.min.js:1001:13)

FranzPoize · 2024-04-03T15:46:23Z

Yes this PR includes all the changes up to 28th of february not sure I'll have the bandwidth to add the more recent changes if somebody can help with that I'd be glad.

I'll fix the codecov issue

chienandalu · 2024-04-04T15:56:04Z

Yes this PR includes all the changes up to 28th of february not sure I'll have the bandwidth to add the more recent changes if somebody can help with that I'd be glad.

I'll fix the codecov issue

We can do this: finish your ongoing fixes and then we can supersed the migration from the 15.0 branch and putting on top your migration commit fixing conflicts and finishing whatever needs to be fixed from there. What do you think?

carolinafernandez-tecnativa · 2024-04-08T14:58:55Z

stock_barcodes/wizard/stock_barcodes_read.py

+        }
+
+    def _create_new_lot(self):
+        StockProductionLot = self.env["stock.production.lot"]


Hi, you need to change this model to stock.lot

StockProductionLot = self.env["stock.lot"]

chienandalu · 2024-04-10T07:36:13Z

Hi, @FranzPoize what do you think about what I proposed?:

We can do this: finish your ongoing fixes and then we can supersed the migration from the 15.0 branch and putting on top your migration commit fixing conflicts and finishing whatever needs to be fixed from there. What do you think?

OCA#195)

…ban view

When user creates a lot, set default product the wizard selected product. When confirm the lot creation wizard, set this lot in lot wizard scanning barcode field.

Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: stock-logistics-barcode-11.0/stock-logistics-barcode-11.0-stock_barcodes Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-barcode-11-0/stock-logistics-barcode-11-0-stock_barcodes/

Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: stock-logistics-barcode-15.0/stock-logistics-barcode-15.0-stock_barcodes Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-barcode-15-0/stock-logistics-barcode-15-0-stock_barcodes/

…t create lot option is checked. Display notification for required field.

Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: stock-logistics-barcode-15.0/stock-logistics-barcode-15.0-stock_barcodes Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-barcode-15-0/stock-logistics-barcode-15-0-stock_barcodes/

… order by location or location_dest_id

Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: stock-logistics-barcode-15.0/stock-logistics-barcode-15.0-stock_barcodes Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-barcode-15-0/stock-logistics-barcode-15-0-stock_barcodes/

TT44219

FranzPoize · 2024-04-25T18:43:06Z

@chienandalu
I'm having a real trouble figuring how the code works.

When you use the barcode button on a picking type. It calls action_barcode_scan on the stock_picking_type models there is 3 methods that are called:

create
determine_todo_action
fill_pending_moves

First called is create this call set_candidate_picking if there is a picking_id but there is no picking_id in the parameters (even when we click on the new button on a picking type). It then calls action_show_step which sets the correct step because most filled_default are still correctly set (by _prepare_barcode_wiz_vals)
Second is determine_todo_action, if the barcode option is guided, this calls fill_todo_records if there is no todo_line_ids (and there isn't) which calls _get_stock_move_lines. Since there is no picking_id, _get_stock_move_lines has to return an empty list. In this method all the default are filled but since there is no todo_line_ids all those value are set to empty sets. This then calls action_show_step again which remove the properly set step because the default value are now all empty.
Third a call to fill_pending_moves this call fill_todo_records again which still does nothing.

So during action_barcode_scan:

create sets the proper default values
action_show_step is called twice once it sets a step (during) create and the second time it undoes what it did because determine_todo_action unset all the default values
fill_todo_records is called twice and twice it does nothing

This means no step at the end in some case (which are real convoluted but not so much).

Set the barcode option as guided
Leave no step with a step number of 0 (if a step with a 0 selected is action_show_step it will trigger the lineself.step = options_required[:1].stepbecause not 0 is True).
And click on the barcode of the picking_type

Or simpler use the demo Picking internals barcode option on internal transfer and click on the barcode on the internal transfer picking type.

rousseldenis · 2024-04-26T06:16:18Z

/ocabot migration stock_barcodes

FranzPoize · 2024-04-26T10:21:23Z

Found the commit that adds a new call to action_show_step in determine_todo_action 50b0c67

This seems to break the option/step finding since if there is no todo_line_ids ,which there isn't in all case where you click on a barcode button on a picking type.

My question is it suppose to work without a picking_id in the stock_barcodes_read_picking ? There is a picking_ids field but it is not used anywhere in the code.

@chienandalu @sergio-teruel

pedrobaeza · 2024-05-02T10:55:51Z

To be taken into account: #605

FranzPoize · 2024-05-02T12:35:17Z

The frontend has been completely redone this should be resolved in 16.0 Le jeu. 2 mai 2024 à 12:56, Pedro M. Baeza ***@***.***> a écrit :

…

To be taken into account: #605 <#605> — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#587 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHNHZYLAG6HRJBVBNBBTRTZAILU3AVCNFSM6AAAAABD6PUX2WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOJQGIYDCOJRGU> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

sergio-teruel · 2024-05-02T13:04:55Z

To be taken into account: #604

sergio-teruel · 2024-05-02T13:05:47Z

@chienandalu I'm having a real trouble figuring how the code works.

When you use the barcode button on a picking type. It calls action_barcode_scan on the stock_picking_type models there is 3 methods that are called:

create

determine_todo_action

fill_pending_moves

First called is create this call set_candidate_picking if there is a picking_id but there is no picking_id in the parameters (even when we click on the new button on a picking type). It then calls action_show_step which sets the correct step because most filled_default are still correctly set (by _prepare_barcode_wiz_vals)

Second is determine_todo_action, if the barcode option is guided, this calls fill_todo_records if there is no todo_line_ids (and there isn't) which calls _get_stock_move_lines. Since there is no picking_id, _get_stock_move_lines has to return an empty list. In this method all the default are filled but since there is no todo_line_ids all those value are set to empty sets. This then calls action_show_step again which remove the properly set step because the default value are now all empty.

Third a call to fill_pending_moves this call fill_todo_records again which still does nothing.

So during action_barcode_scan:

create sets the proper default values

action_show_step is called twice once it sets a step (during) create and the second time it undoes what it did because determine_todo_action unset all the default values

fill_todo_records is called twice and twice it does nothing

This means no step at the end in some case (which are real convoluted but not so much).

Set the barcode option as guided

Leave no step with a step number of 0 (if a step with a 0 selected is action_show_step it will trigger the lineself.step = options_required[:1].stepbecause not 0 is True).

And click on the barcode of the picking_type

Or simpler use the demo Picking internals barcode option on internal transfer and click on the barcode on the internal transfer picking type.

The next week in Spanish OCA days we will work about it...

pedrobaeza · 2024-05-13T07:25:26Z

Superseded by #610, that was the result of the Spanish OCA days,

FranzPoize force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_barcodes branch from fdee2ca to 43de03a Compare February 29, 2024 13:32

FranzPoize force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_barcodes branch from 43de03a to 524c3b0 Compare March 26, 2024 12:53

FranzPoize marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2024 12:55

FranzPoize force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_barcodes branch 2 times, most recently from 5afdd8a to e873c36 Compare March 27, 2024 09:17

FranzPoize mentioned this pull request Mar 27, 2024

Migration to version 16.0 #440

Open

13 tasks

chienandalu suggested changes Apr 2, 2024

View reviewed changes

FranzPoize force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_barcodes branch from e873c36 to 667f9d6 Compare April 3, 2024 15:21

chienandalu reviewed Apr 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

chienandalu suggested changes Apr 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

carolinafernandez-tecnativa reviewed Apr 8, 2024

View reviewed changes

FranzPoize force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_barcodes branch from 667f9d6 to 64b56e0 Compare April 9, 2024 13:36

FranzPoize force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_barcodes branch 2 times, most recently from 7ed52ba to 5f4dde5 Compare April 19, 2024 15:33

sergio-teruel and others added 11 commits April 19, 2024 17:40

[ADD] stock_barcodes: New module to read barcodes on stocks operations (

d9eb7a4

OCA#195)

[UPD] README.rst

3740e1d

[UPD] Update stock_barcodes.pot

473e243

[FIX] stock_barcodes: Fix ES translation

f3173d3

[ADD] stock_barcodes: Allow to read barcodes from pickings

7212f52

[ADD] stock_barcodes: Allow to read barcodes from pickings. Last changes

c4930fc

[FIX] stock_barcodes: Fix validate picking from candidate picking kan…

c78e491

…ban view

[IMP] stock_barcodes: Hidden lot for non tracking products.

53f9ce5

When user creates a lot, set default product the wizard selected product. When confirm the lot creation wizard, set this lot in lot wizard scanning barcode field.

[UPD] Update stock_barcodes.pot

6055641

[UPD] README.rst

746de44

weblate and others added 11 commits April 19, 2024 17:40

[FIX] stock_barcodes: Required lot_id although lot_name is set withou…

46dc7fe

…t create lot option is checked. Display notification for required field.

[UPD] Update stock_barcodes.pot

b44cb7c

[BOT] post-merge updates

48f5500

[IMP] stock_barcodes: Add option group to allow to select if you want…

bea9129

… order by location or location_dest_id

[UPD] Update stock_barcodes.pot

f31a1a0

[BOT] post-merge updates

7dee0ff

[IMP] stock_barcodes: black, isort, prettier

55b0814

[MIG] stock_barcodes: Migration to 16.0

6bda4d3

FranzPoize force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_barcodes branch from 5f4dde5 to 6bda4d3 Compare April 19, 2024 16:01

[MIG] stock_barcodes: followup migration

52aa7ce

TT44219

chienandalu mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2024

[16.0][MIG] stock_barcodes: followup migration #603

Closed

4 tasks

rousseldenis added needs review migration labels Apr 26, 2024

OCA-git-bot added this to the 16.0 milestone Apr 26, 2024

FranzPoize force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_barcodes branch from cbe6ee6 to 95f3aa3 Compare April 29, 2024 13:01

[MIG] stock_barcodes: more migrating

3828828

FranzPoize force-pushed the 16.0-mig-stock_barcodes branch from 95f3aa3 to 3828828 Compare May 8, 2024 10:57

chienandalu mentioned this pull request May 8, 2024

[16.0][MIG] stock_barcodes: Migration to 16.0 #610

Merged

pedrobaeza closed this May 13, 2024

	return barcodeModels.indexOf(modelName) !== -1;
	return barcodeModels.includes(modelName);

[16.0] [MIG] stock_barcodes #587

[16.0] [MIG] stock_barcodes #587

Conversation

FranzPoize commented Feb 28, 2024

angelmoya commented Mar 1, 2024

chienandalu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

FranzPoize Apr 3, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

FranzPoize commented Apr 3, 2024 • edited Loading

chienandalu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

chienandalu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

FranzPoize commented Apr 3, 2024 • edited Loading

chienandalu commented Apr 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

chienandalu commented Apr 10, 2024

FranzPoize commented Apr 25, 2024

rousseldenis commented Apr 26, 2024

FranzPoize commented Apr 26, 2024

pedrobaeza commented May 2, 2024

FranzPoize commented May 2, 2024 via email

sergio-teruel commented May 2, 2024

sergio-teruel commented May 2, 2024

pedrobaeza commented May 13, 2024

FranzPoize Apr 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

FranzPoize commented Apr 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

FranzPoize commented Apr 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading