Skip to content

next/833/20250417/v1 #13035

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 17, 2025
Merged

Conversation

victorjulien and others added 11 commits April 17, 2025 08:22
If for the same a packet a drop rule and a pass rule would match,
the applying of actions could be contradictionary:

- the drop would be applied to the packet
- the pass rule would also be considered, not overriding the drop,
  but still setting the flow pass flag.

This would lead to the packet being dropped, but the rest of the
flow getting passed, including retransmissions of the dropped
packet.

This patch only sets drop/pass actions if no conflicting action
has been set on the packet before. It respects the action-order.

Bug: OISF#7653.
For firewall mode, set the pseudo table in the rule and use this
in alert queue ordering, so that rule actions are applied in the
expected order:

        packet:filter -> packet:td -> app:filter -> app:td

This makes sure that a packet:td drop is applied before a app:filter
accept.
Ticket: OISF#7143

Update documentation to reflect new sticky buffer keyword format
email.received matches on MIME EMAIL Received
This keyword maps to the EVE field email.received[]
It is a sticky buffer
Supports multiple buffer matching
Supports prefiltering

Ticket: OISF#7599
Issue: 3436

Serialize rotation flag handling to avoid corruption.
Issue: 3436

Remove duplicate register of the rotation flag. Eventually, this will
cause corruption when the file context has been freed and the rotation
flag is deregistered.
Copy link

NOTE: This PR may contain new authors.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 25713

@victorjulien victorjulien merged commit d59f5d6 into OISF:master Apr 17, 2025
55 checks passed
@victorjulien victorjulien deleted the next/833/20250417/v1 branch April 17, 2025 16:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants