-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Datajson v6.5 #13343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Datajson v6.5 #13343
Conversation
This patch introduces new option to dataset keyword. Where regular dataset allows match from sets, dataset with json format allows the same but also adds JSON data to the alert event. This data is coming from the set definition it self. For example, an ipv4 set will look like: [{"ip": "10.16.1.11", "test": "success","context":3}] The syntax is a JSON array but it can also be a JSON object with an array inside. The idea is to directly used data coming from the API of a threat intel management software. The syntax of the keyword is the following: dataset:isset,src_ip,type ip,load src.lst,format json, \ enrichment_key src_ip, value_key ip; Compare to dataset, it just have a supplementary option key that is used to indicate in which subobject the JSON value should be added. The information is added in the even under the alert.extra subobject: "alert": { "extra": { "src_ip": { "ip": "10.6.1.11", "test": "success", "context": 3 }, The main interest of the feature is to be able to contextualize a match. For example, if you have an IOC source, you can do [ {"buffer": "value1", "actor":"APT28","Country":"FR"}, {"buffer": "value2", "actor":"APT32","Country":"NL"} ] This way, a single dataset is able to produce context to the event where it was not possible before and multiple signatures had to be used. The format introduced in datajson is an evolution of the historical datarep format. This has some limitations. For example, if a user fetch IOCs from a threat intel server there is a large change that the format will be JSON or XML. Suricata has no support for the second but can support the first one. Keeping the key value may seem redundant but it is useful to have it directly accessible in the extra data to be able to query it independantly of the signature (where it can be multiple metadata or even be a transformed metadata). In some case, when interacting with data (mostly coming from threat intel servers), the JSON array containing the data to use is not at the root of the object and it is ncessary to access a subobject. This patch implements this with support of key in level1.level2. This is done via the `array_key` option that contains the path to the data. Ticket: OISF#7372
With datajson infrastructure in place, it is now possible to add data in the extra information section. Following an idea by Jason Ish, this patch adds the feature for pcre extraction. A PCRE such as pcre:"/(?P<alert_ua>[a-zA-Z]+)\//" will add the content of the captured group to alert.extra.ua.
It can contain any vars so need addition properties.
There is just a change in the iterator to go from json to jsonline so let's factorize the parsing functions. Ticket: OISF#7372
This format allows to use a one valid JSON object per line in the data file. Ticket: OISF#7372
This option allows to remove the key corresponding to the match value from the JSON object before creating the JSON object that will be added to the `extra` data. For example, matching on the following JSON on the `ip` key: ```json {"ip": "10.16.1.11", "test": "success", "context":3} ``` with a match like: ``` dataset:isset,src_ip,type ip,load src.lst,format jsonline,enrichment_key src_ip,value_key ip; ``` will produce the following: ```json "extra": { "src_ip": { "ip": "10.16.1.11", "test": "success", "context": 3 } ``` if we add the `remove_key` option to the match: ``` dataset:isset,src_ip,type ip,load src.lst,format jsonline,enrichment_key src_ip,value_key ip, remove_key; ``` it will produce the following: ```json "extra": { "src_ip": { "test": "success", "context": 3 } ``` The option is set to false by default. Ticket: OISF#7372
Patch adds ``remove_key`` option and clarifies the text.
Using `alert.extra` was not really reflecting the nature of what was added. So renaming it to `alert.context`.
They are is renamed to datasets-context-json.* so we see that it is about context and not about a new datasets type.
This will be used to factorize the code with datajson.
Factorize DatasetGet and DatajsonGet to only have the difference between the two in the respective function.
DatajsonAdd function is now responsible of the handling of the mem of datajsontype passed as argument.
@regit Can you split out independent commits into a separate PR to make review easier? |
scan-build
|
|
||
Example adding 'google.com' to set 'myset':: | ||
|
||
dataset-add-json myset string Z29vZ2xlLmNvbQ== {"city":"Mountain View"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On exit after trying this, I get a leak:
==165801==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 27 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fcec1120e15 in malloc /usr/src/debug/gcc/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:67
#1 0x7fcec107cc6a in strndup /usr/src/debug/gcc/gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_interceptors.inc:450
#2 0x558814f38868 in SCStrndupFunc /home/jason/oisf/dev/suricata/review/src/util-mem.c:90
#3 0x558815851c67 in ParseJsonLine /home/jason/oisf/dev/suricata/review/src/datasets-context-json.c:85
#4 0x558815859561 in DatajsonAddSerialized /home/jason/oisf/dev/suricata/review/src/datasets-context-json.c:892
#5 0x558815602fd7 in UnixSocketDatajsonAdd /home/jason/oisf/dev/suricata/review/src/runmode-unix-socket.c:865
#6 0x558814ef35d4 in UnixCommandExecute /home/jason/oisf/dev/suricata/review/src/unix-manager.c:499
#7 0x558814ef4380 in UnixCommandRun /home/jason/oisf/dev/suricata/review/src/unix-manager.c:615
#8 0x558814ef4ab9 in UnixMain /home/jason/oisf/dev/suricata/review/src/unix-manager.c:666
#9 0x558814ef836a in UnixManager /home/jason/oisf/dev/suricata/review/src/unix-manager.c:1163
#10 0x558814ee093f in TmThreadsManagement /home/jason/oisf/dev/suricata/review/src/tm-threads.c:571
#11 0x7fcec105e29a in asan_thread_start /usr/src/debug/gcc/gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:239
#12 0x7fcec0be77ea (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x957ea) (BuildId: 468e3585c794491a48ea75fceb9e4d6b1464fc35)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 27 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For this, can you provide an example of how that dataset was setup? It appears to be accepted, but I can't get the JSON into my alert.
On rule loading, if I forget the
But if I forget the
I believe the |
|
||
Example rules could look like:: | ||
|
||
alert http any any -> any any (msg:"IP match"; ip.dst; dataset:isset,bad_ips, type ip, load bad_ips.json, format json, enrichment_key bad_ones, value_key ip; sid:8000001;) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could value_key
simply be key
? For the JSON format, we'll always need a 'primary' key of sorts, so just simplify it to key.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could enrichment_key
be context_key
, since it lands in the context
object of the alert?
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ enum DetectKeywordId { | |||
DETECT_BYTE_EXTRACT, | |||
DETECT_DATASET, | |||
DETECT_DATAREP, | |||
DETECT_DATAJSON, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No longer used?
This is nice.. I converted https://threatview.io/Downloads/High-Confidence-CobaltStrike-C2%20-Feeds.txt to a NDJSON dataset, and can now get extra context like: "alert": {
"action": "allowed",
"gid": 1,
"signature_id": 2,
"rev": 0,
"signature": "Threatview C2",
"category": "",
"severity": 3,
"context": {
"threatview": {
"ip": "107.148.1.188",
"date": "16 June 2024 02:37 PM UTC",
"host": "support.whatsappsignup.com",
"protocol": "https",
"beacon_config": "support.whatsappsignup.com,/jquery-4.8.1.min.js",
"comment": "Generated by Threatview[.]io"
}
}
}, Instead of just an IP address and the message |
Update of #13194.
Scan-build report an issue that seems like a false positive to me. Second pair of eyes welcome here.
Contribution style:
https://docs.suricata.io/en/latest/devguide/contributing/contribution-process.html
Our Contribution agreements:
https://suricata.io/about/contribution-agreement/ (note: this is only required once)
Changes (if applicable):
(including schema descriptions)
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/projects/suricata/issues
Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7372
Describe changes:
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2535