You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: benchmarks/Jumps/VR_Aggregator_Benchmark.jmd
+27-27Lines changed: 27 additions & 27 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ rng = StableRNG(12345)
15
15
16
16
# Introduction
17
17
18
-
This document benchmarks the performance of variable rate jumps in `JumpProcesses.jl` and visualizes example solution trajectories for the test cases from `variable_rate_test.jl`. The benchmark compares `VRDirectCB` and `VRFRMODE` aggregators, while the visualization shows state variables vs. time to verify simulation behavior.
18
+
This document benchmarks the performance of variable rate jumps in `JumpProcesses.jl` and visualizes example solution trajectories for the test cases from `variable_rate_test.jl`. The benchmark compares `VR_Direct` and `VR_FRM` aggregators, while the visualization shows state variables vs. time to verify simulation behavior.
19
19
20
20
**Note**: If you encounter a precompilation error due to method overwriting in `JumpProcesses.jl`, add `__precompile__(false)` to `/home/siva/Desktop/julia/JumpProcesses.jl/src/JumpProcesses.jl` and clear the compilation cache (`rm -rf ~/.julia/compiled`).
21
21
@@ -37,26 +37,26 @@ We define factories for each test case to create problems with a variable number
0 commit comments