Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add: new questions on subclinical hyperthyroidism, primary hyperparat…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…hyroidism, diabetic foot infections, Cushing's syndrome diagnosis, and complex DKA management
  • Loading branch information
Skippou committed Jan 6, 2025
1 parent e1c9881 commit 05e838e
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 6 changed files with 628 additions and 0 deletions.
99 changes: 99 additions & 0 deletions questions/endocrinology/adrenal/cushings.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
---
id: ENDO006
specialty: endocrinology
topic: adrenal
difficulty: hard
tags: [endocrine, diagnosis, treatment, imaging, copilot, claude35Sonnet]
created: 2025-01-06
lastUpdated: 2025-01-06
---

# Cushing's Syndrome Diagnosis

## Question
A 35-year-old woman presents with:
- 18-month history of weight gain
- Easy bruising
- Proximal muscle weakness
- Depression
- New-onset hypertension
- Irregular menses

Physical exam:
- Central obesity
- Moon facies
- Purple striae
- Buffalo hump
- BP: 158/92 mmHg

Initial testing:
- 24h UFC: 280 µg/24h (normal <50)
- 1mg overnight DST cortisol: 12 µg/dL (331 nmol/L)
- ACTH: 85 pg/mL (18.7 pmol/L)
- 8am cortisol: 28 µg/dL (772 nmol/L)
- Midnight salivary cortisol: 0.35 µg/dL (9.7 nmol/L)

Which next diagnostic step is most appropriate?

## Options
| Option | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| A) | Pituitary MRI with contrast |
| B) | High-dose dexamethasone suppression test |
| C) | CRH stimulation test |
| D) | Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling |
| E) | CT chest/abdomen/pelvis |

<details>
<summary>View Answer</summary>

## Correct Answer
D

## Explanation
1. Diagnostic Assessment:
- Confirmed hypercortisolism:
* Elevated UFC
* Failed overnight DST
* Elevated midnight cortisol
- ACTH-dependent Cushing's:
* ACTH >20 pg/mL rules out primary adrenal
* Suggests pituitary or ectopic source

2. Next Step Rationale:
- IPSS indicated because:
* Need to differentiate pituitary from ectopic
* ACTH in intermediate range (>20 but <100)
* High stakes decision for surgery
* Most accurate test for source localization

3. Why Other Options Wrong:
- Option A:
* MRI alone insufficient
* Many incidental adenomas
* Can miss small tumors

- Option B:
* Less accurate than IPSS
* Won't definitively locate source

- Option C:
* Lower accuracy than IPSS
* Won't change management

- Option E:
* Premature without ACTH source confirmation
* Unnecessary radiation if pituitary source

## References
- Endocrine Society Guidelines 2023
- NEJM 2022: "Cushing's Syndrome Diagnosis"
- J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021

## Teaching Points
1. Diagnostic algorithm
2. Test interpretation
3. Source localization
4. Imaging limitations
5. Treatment planning
</details>
102 changes: 102 additions & 0 deletions questions/endocrinology/diabetes/diabetic-foot.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
---
id: ENDO007
specialty: endocrinology
topic: diabetes
difficulty: medium
tags: [endocrine, infections, treatment, chronicCare, copilot]
created: 2025-01-06
lastUpdated: 2025-01-06
---

# Diabetic Foot Infection Management

## Question
A 58-year-old man with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 8.9%) presents with:
- 2-week history of right foot ulcer
- Worsening pain and redness
- Moderate drainage
- No fever

Examination shows:
- 3cm x 2cm ulcer over plantar surface
- Probing to bone
- Surrounding erythema 2cm
- Pedal pulses present
- Normal temperature

Labs:
- WBC: 11,200/µL
- ESR: 55 mm/hr
- CRP: 4.2 mg/dL
- Creatinine: 1.1 mg/dL

Foot X-ray shows no osteomyelitis.

Which initial management is most appropriate?

## Options
| Option | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| A) | Oral amoxicillin-clavulanate + wound care |
| B) | Hospital admission + IV vancomycin |
| C) | MRI foot + bone biopsy |
| D) | Amputation |
| E) | Topical antibiotics only |

<details>
<summary>View Answer</summary>

## Correct Answer
A

## Explanation
1. Assessment:
- Moderate infection:
* Local inflammation
* No systemic signs
* Probing to bone but negative X-ray
* Intact circulation

2. Treatment Rationale:
- Outpatient management appropriate:
* No sepsis
* No deep tissue involvement
* Good blood supply
* Patient stable

- Oral antibiotics sufficient:
* Broad spectrum coverage needed
* Common pathogens covered
* Good tissue penetration
* Can be modified based on culture

3. Why Other Options Wrong:
- Option B:
* Too aggressive
* No indication for IV therapy
* Unnecessary hospitalization

- Option C:
* Not indicated without X-ray changes
* Can consider if no improvement

- Option D:
* Far too aggressive
* No tissue necrosis
* Good blood supply

- Option E:
* Insufficient coverage
* Won't prevent progression

## References
- IDSA Guidelines 2022: "Diabetic Foot Infections"
- ADA Standards of Care 2023

## Teaching Points
1. Infection severity assessment
2. Antibiotic selection principles
3. Role of imaging
4. Indications for hospitalization
5. Follow-up monitoring
</details>
102 changes: 102 additions & 0 deletions questions/endocrinology/diabetes/dka-management.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
---
id: ENDO004
specialty: endocrinology
topic: diabetes
difficulty: hard
tags: [endocrine, emergencies, criticalCare, acidBase, electrolytes, claude35Sonnet]
created: 2025-01-06
lastUpdated: 2025-01-06
---

# Complex DKA Management

## Question
A 25-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes presents with:
- Severe abdominal pain
- Vomiting for 24 hours
- Altered mental status

Initial labs:
- Glucose: 680 mg/dL (37.8 mmol/L)
- pH: 6.95
- Bicarbonate: 5 mEq/L
- Anion gap: 32
- Na: 128 mEq/L
- K: 5.8 mEq/L
- BUN: 48 mg/dL
- Serum osmolality: 328 mOsm/kg

After 6 hours of standard DKA protocol:
- Glucose: 240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L)
- Persistent acidosis (pH 7.10)
- Worsening mental status
- New focal neurologic deficits

Which immediate intervention is most appropriate?

## Options
| Option | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| A) | Increase insulin drip rate + continue current fluids |
| B) | Emergent head CT + mannitol + hypertonic saline |
| C) | Switch to subcutaneous insulin + oral hydration |
| D) | Add bicarbonate infusion + increase fluid rate |
| E) | Decrease dextrose concentration in IV fluids |

<details>
<summary>View Answer</summary>

## Correct Answer
B

## Explanation
1. Clinical Assessment:
- Initial severe DKA with:
* Profound acidosis
* Significant hyperglycemia
* High osmolality
- Concerning development:
* Rapid glucose correction
* New neurologic deficits
* Mental status changes
* Suggests cerebral edema

2. Management Priority:
- Cerebral edema is life-threatening:
* 20-40% mortality
* Requires immediate intervention
* Diagnostic imaging crucial
- Osmotic therapy:
* Mannitol reduces ICP
* Hypertonic saline stabilizes osmolality
* Time-sensitive intervention

3. Why Other Options Fail:
- Option A:
* May worsen cerebral edema
* Doesn't address neurologic deterioration

- Option C:
* Inappropriate during acute crisis
* Dangerous in cerebral edema

- Option D:
* Bicarbonate controversial in DKA
* Won't address cerebral edema

- Option E:
* Secondary concern
* Delays critical intervention

## References
- NEJM 2022: "DKA Management Updates"
- Pediatric Critical Care 2021: "Cerebral Edema in DKA"
- Endocrine Society Guidelines 2023

## Teaching Points
1. Recognition of cerebral edema
2. Rapid intervention importance
3. Osmotic therapy principles
4. Monitoring complications
5. Prevention strategies
</details>
Loading

0 comments on commit 05e838e

Please sign in to comment.