Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
56 lines (37 loc) · 1.98 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

56 lines (37 loc) · 1.98 KB

wtc-reviews

Instead of suffering, I let Bash and Python suffer for me. wtc-reviews automates the repetitive task of accepting, commenting, and completing code reviews in my school’s terminal-based LMS. It makes the whole process more efficienct and less frustrating...It might also get you in some trouble too, trust me on this one.

🚀 What It Does

  • Runs the LMS review command repeatedly until a review is available.
  • Extracts the UUID of the next reviewable submission.
  • Accepts the review (if possible).
  • Leaves a thoughtful comment: "Nice".
  • Completes the review and moves on to the next one.
  • Repeats until no more reviews are left.

Basically, it turns a tedious manual process into an automated dream… or a review farm, depending on who’s asking.

🛠️ Tech Stack

  • Bash – Because scripting is life.
  • Python – For smarter text parsing.
  • wtc-lms CLI – The tool I had to outsmart.

🔧 Installation & Usage

Linux & macOS

git clone https://github.com/adudumayo/wtc-reviews.git  
cd wtc-reviews  
chmod +x reviewCommand.sh  
./reviewCommand.sh

Windows

  • Just WSL, if doesn't work then sorry!.

📝 How It Works

  1. reviewCommand.sh keeps running wtc-lms reviews until it finds an available review.
  2. uuidFinder.py extracts the UUID of the next reviewable submission.
  3. acceptor.py checks if the review was successfully accepted.
  4. The script adds a comment (you can customize this to maybe "lgmt", but "Nice" is a classic).
  5. It completes the review and starts over until all reviews are done.

⚠️ Disclaimer

  • This was built for fun and efficiency (Although I had to answer a few questions about it).
  • If you're an LMS admin reading this... I blame Perfomance Team 👀

📌 Contribution

If you have ideas for better comments than "Nice", feel free to fork and PR.

📄 License

MIT – Use it wisely.