Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UI: Proper explanation for the global setting to avoid ambiguity #10042

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: 4.20
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor

@Pearl1594 Pearl1594 commented Dec 4, 2024

Description

Fixes: #10041
This PR provides Proper explanation for the global setting to avoid ambiguity

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 16.00%. Comparing base (4f3e8e8) to head (d2b2419).
Report is 10 commits behind head on 4.20.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...n/java/com/cloud/resource/ResourceManagerImpl.java 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...java/com/cloud/agent/manager/AgentManagerImpl.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.20   #10042      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     15.99%   16.00%   +0.01%     
- Complexity    13076    13081       +5     
============================================
  Files          5649     5649              
  Lines        495612   495978     +366     
  Branches      59995    60134     +139     
============================================
+ Hits          79249    79364     +115     
- Misses       407514   407769     +255     
+ Partials       8849     8845       -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.03% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unittests 16.83% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Pearl1594 Pearl1594 force-pushed the rename-ambiguous-globalsetting branch from 18cfe56 to 425fc95 Compare December 4, 2024 16:37
@Pearl1594 Pearl1594 changed the base branch from 4.19 to 4.20 December 4, 2024 16:37
@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@Pearl1594 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 4, 2024

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11714

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland linked an issue Dec 5, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland added this to the 4.20.1 milestone Dec 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks mostly good, needs testing

Copy link
Contributor

@shwstppr shwstppr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Pearl1594 I think if we just do the following change then it should be good enough. In my opinion, global config is largely okay.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nvazquez Apologies for the confusion, I had put the wrong name in the PR description - the global setting name has been renamed to kvm.host.auto.enable.disable. I've updated the schema file and fixed merge conflicts

@Pearl1594 Pearl1594 changed the title [WIP] Rename ambiguous global setting: enable.kvm.host.auto.enable.disable Rename ambiguous global setting: enable.kvm.host.auto.enable.disable Feb 12, 2025
@Pearl1594 Pearl1594 marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2025 15:43
@Pearl1594 Pearl1594 requested a review from nvazquez February 13, 2025 01:58
@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12380)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 53266 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10042-t12380-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 138 look OK, 3 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_11_isolated_network_with_dynamic_routed_mode Error 2.31 test_ipv4_routing.py
test_12_vpc_and_tier_with_dynamic_routed_mode Error 3.41 test_ipv4_routing.py
test_12_vpc_and_tier_with_dynamic_routed_mode Error 3.42 test_ipv4_routing.py
test_01_auto_enable_disable_kvm_host Error 0.07 test_host_control_state.py
test_02_disable_host_overrides_auto_enable_kvm_host Error 0.06 test_host_control_state.py
test_03_enable_host_does_not_override_auto_disable_kvm_host Error 0.07 test_host_control_state.py
test_06_purge_expunged_vm_background_task Failure 393.77 test_purge_expunged_vms.py

Copy link
Contributor

@shwstppr shwstppr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Pearl1594 I guess we're in somewhat agreement that changes should be limited to ui/src/views/infra/HostEnableDisable.vue
Can you please revert other changes and rename the PR title?

@Pearl1594 Pearl1594 changed the title Rename ambiguous global setting: enable.kvm.host.auto.enable.disable UI: Proper explanation for the global setting to avoid ambiguity Feb 13, 2025
@Pearl1594 Pearl1594 requested a review from shwstppr February 13, 2025 11:33
Copy link
Contributor

@nvazquez nvazquez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @Pearl1594 LGTM - just a few non-blocking comments to keep the changes to minimal

Copy link
Contributor

@shwstppr shwstppr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor suggestions, otherwise code lgtm

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@Pearl1594 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12448

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@Pearl1594 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12412)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 53507 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10042-t12412-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 139 look OK, 2 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_09_connectivity_between_network_and_vpc_tier Failure 60.30 test_ipv4_routing.py
test_11_isolated_network_with_dynamic_routed_mode Error 2.32 test_ipv4_routing.py
test_12_vpc_and_tier_with_dynamic_routed_mode Error 3.42 test_ipv4_routing.py
test_12_vpc_and_tier_with_dynamic_routed_mode Error 3.42 test_ipv4_routing.py
test_06_purge_expunged_vm_background_task Failure 401.41 test_purge_expunged_vms.py

@Pearl1594
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@Pearl1594 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

Copy link
Contributor

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clgtm

Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
C Maintainability Rating on New Code (required ≥ B)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12504

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Confusing dialog text
5 participants