Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introducing Storage Access Groups for better management for host and storage connections #10381

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

harikrishna-patnala
Copy link
Contributor

@harikrishna-patnala harikrishna-patnala commented Feb 13, 2025

Description

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@harikrishna-patnala harikrishna-patnala added this to the 4.21.0 milestone Feb 13, 2025
@apache apache deleted a comment from blueorangutan Feb 13, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.93767% with 1402 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 16.16%. Comparing base (0dcb8da) to head (a3dd0b7).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...n/java/com/cloud/resource/ResourceManagerImpl.java 55.79% 206 Missing and 42 partials ⚠️
...ain/java/com/cloud/api/query/QueryManagerImpl.java 0.00% 123 Missing ⚠️
.../storage/datastore/db/PrimaryDataStoreDaoImpl.java 5.42% 122 Missing ⚠️
...ain/java/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java 50.00% 88 Missing and 34 partials ⚠️
.../src/main/java/com/cloud/host/dao/HostDaoImpl.java 0.00% 61 Missing ⚠️
...orage/dao/StoragePoolAndAccessGroupMapDaoImpl.java 0.00% 51 Missing ⚠️
...mmand/admin/storage/ConfigureStorageAccessCmd.java 0.00% 44 Missing ⚠️
...stack/api/response/StorageAccessGroupResponse.java 0.00% 43 Missing ⚠️
...torage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java 0.00% 40 Missing ⚠️
...om/cloud/api/query/dao/StoragePoolJoinDaoImpl.java 0.00% 29 Missing ⚠️
... and 58 more
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #10381      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     16.07%   16.16%   +0.09%     
- Complexity    13189    13320     +131     
============================================
  Files          5664     5672       +8     
  Lines        497599   499728    +2129     
  Branches      60214    60516     +302     
============================================
+ Hits          79983    80802     +819     
- Misses       408666   409843    +1177     
- Partials       8950     9083     +133     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.98% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
unittests 17.02% <25.93%> (+0.10%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@harikrishna-patnala
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@harikrishna-patnala a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 12435

@harikrishna-patnala
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@harikrishna-patnala a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12456

@rohityadavcloud
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@rohityadavcloud a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@harikrishna-patnala
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@harikrishna-patnala a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12459

@harikrishna-patnala
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@harikrishna-patnala a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@blueorangutan
Copy link

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-12407)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 52229 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr10381-t12407-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 139 look OK, 2 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test Result Time (s) Test File
test_11_isolated_network_with_dynamic_routed_mode Error 2.27 test_ipv4_routing.py
test_12_vpc_and_tier_with_dynamic_routed_mode Error 1.37 test_ipv4_routing.py
test_12_vpc_and_tier_with_dynamic_routed_mode Error 1.37 test_ipv4_routing.py
test_06_purge_expunged_vm_background_task Failure 389.95 test_purge_expunged_vms.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants