Skip to content

fix(deps): update dependency jacoco to v0.8.12 #6439

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2025

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
jacoco (source) 0.8.11 -> 0.8.12 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jacoco/jacoco (jacoco)

v0.8.12: 0.8.12

New Features
  • JaCoCo now officially supports Java 22 (GitHub #​1596).
  • Experimental support for Java 23 class files (GitHub #​1553).
Fixed bugs
  • Branches added by the Kotlin compiler for functions with default arguments and having more than 32 parameters are filtered out during generation of report (GitHub #​1556).
  • Branch added by the Kotlin compiler version 1.5.0 and above for reading from lateinit property is filtered out during generation of report (GitHub #​1568).
Non-functional Changes
  • JaCoCo now depends on ASM 9.7 (GitHub #​1600).

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every 3 weeks on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@vlsi vlsi merged commit 96ea3c0 into apache:master Mar 24, 2025
7 checks passed
@renovate-bot renovate-bot deleted the renovate/jacoco-0.x branch March 24, 2025 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants