Enforce explicit names for global scripts and refine script id handling #3691
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR addresses issue #3176 by ensuring scripts defined in the global
<Scripts>
container have explicit, non-blank names. It also introduces a clearer distinction between user-defined names and internal script identifiers.Key Changes:
AbstractScript
now providesgetName()
strictly for user-configured names, which can be null or blank. It also introducesgetId()
to consistently return a non-blank internal identifier, falling back totoString()
if no explicit name is set.ScriptsPlugin
now throws aConfigurationException
if any script defined directly under the global<Scripts>
element lacks an explicit name.ScriptManager
and various script-using components were updated. They now utilize thescript.getId()
for internal referencing.AbstractScript
andScriptsPlugin
.