[improve][pip] PIP-404: Introduce per ledger properties

[dao-jun]

Motivation

PIP doc

Modifications

Verifying this change

• Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

• Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
• Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If the box was checked, please highlight the changes

• Dependencies (add or upgrade a dependency)
• The public API
• The schema
• The default values of configurations
• The threading model
• The binary protocol
• The REST endpoints
• The admin CLI options
• The metrics
• Anything that affects deployment

Documentation

• doc
• doc-required
• doc-not-needed
• doc-complete

[lhotari]

@dao-jun PIP-401 is already taken. Please always search the mailing list and Pulsar issues to find the next unused PIP number. The first one to start a discussion with a PIP number on the dev mailing list wins when there are conflicts.

[dao-jun]

@dao-jun PIP-401 is already taken. Please always search the mailing list and Pulsar issues to find the next unused PIP number. The first one to start a discussion with a PIP number on the dev mailing list wins when there are conflicts.

Thanks for your reminder, I didn't noticed.

[thetumbled]

Good idea, could we support constructing general index for users to facilitate sql-like query? In such way, we don't need to consume pulsar to aggegrate data into database like hive.

[BewareMyPower]

LGTM, please rename the file

[dao-jun]

LGTM, please rename the file

Thanks, renamed.

[dao-jun]

This PIP is approved with 3 bindings