feat: port autoware_route_handler from Autoware Universe

[mitsudome-r]

Description

This PR ports autoware_route_handler from Autoware Universe as part of #190

Related links

Parent Issue:

• Porting autoware_behavior_velocity_planner_common、autoware_behavior_velocity_stop_line_module to autoware.core #190

This PR must be merged after:

• feat(autoware_test_utils): porting autoware_test_utils from universe to core #172
• feat: replace autoware_universe_utils with autoware_utils in autoware_route_handler autoware.universe#10153
• feat(autoware_behavior_velocity_planner_common): replace autoware_universe_utils with autoware_utils autoware.universe#10154

How was this PR tested?

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[youtalk]

This is a porting PR so that I only conducted a minimal review.

[youtalk]

LGTM

[xmfcx]

Here is the failed cppcheck report:

/home/runner/work/autoware.core/autoware.core/planning/autoware_route_handler/src/route_handler.cpp:64:3: style: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
  for (const auto & p : primitives) {
  ^
/home/runner/work/autoware.core/autoware.core/planning/autoware_route_handler/src/route_handler.cpp:74:3: style: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
  for (const auto & i : vectors) {
  ^
/home/runner/work/autoware.core/autoware.core/planning/autoware_route_handler/src/route_handler.cpp:149:26: style: Consider using std::transform algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
    piecewise_ref_points.push_back(ReferencePoint{true, piecewise_waypoint});
                         ^
/home/runner/work/autoware.core/autoware.core/planning/autoware_route_handler/src/route_handler.cpp:519:3: style: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
  for (const auto & llt : route_lanelets_) {
  ^
/home/runner/work/autoware.core/autoware.core/planning/autoware_route_handler/src/route_handler.cpp:1017:0: style: Consider using std::find_if algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
      if (isRoadLanelet(right_lanelet)) return right_lanelet;
^
/home/runner/work/autoware.core/autoware.core/planning/autoware_route_handler/src/route_handler.cpp:1083:0: style: Consider using std::find_if algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
      if (isRoadLanelet(left_lanelet)) return left_lanelet;
^
/home/runner/work/autoware.core/autoware.core/planning/autoware_route_handler/src/route_handler.cpp:2073:3: style: Consider using std::any_of algorithm instead of a raw loop. [useStlAlgorithm]
  for (const auto & llt : path)
  ^
nofile:0:0: information: Active checkers: 172/592 (use --checkers-report=<filename> to see details) [checkersReport]

I will try to fix them or add exceptions.

[xmfcx]

Will create a PR to add useStlAlgorithm and checkersReport suppressions.

For the porting process, let's keep the changes to minimum. And then gradually remove the restrictions once basic move operations are finished.

https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware.universe/blob/769673c95d12a6361c6e3e89c5bd10ab5e1cadba/.cppcheck_suppressions#L5-L11

Created the PR:

• chore(.cppcheck_suppressions): add checkersReport, useStlAlgorithm #225

[xmfcx]

@mitsudome-r -san, shouldn't there be a PR on universe side that removes this package?

Couldn't find here: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aautowarefoundation%2Fautoware.universe+autoware_route_handler&type=pullrequests

Here is the package: https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware.universe/tree/769673c95d12a6361c6e3e89c5bd10ab5e1cadba/planning/autoware_route_handler

[xmfcx]

Also the CI doesn't pass: https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware.core/actions/runs/13537260433/job/37831081771?pr=201#step:5:6907

In file included from /__w/autoware.core/autoware.core/planning/autoware_route_handler/test/test_route_handler.cpp:15:
/__w/autoware.core/autoware.core/planning/autoware_route_handler/test/test_route_handler.hpp:23:10: fatal error: autoware_test_utils/autoware_test_utils.hpp: No such file or directory
   23 | #include <autoware_test_utils/autoware_test_utils.hpp>
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 34.41503% with 768 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 22.32%. Comparing base (4cb18f5) to head (6499d2f).
Report is 61 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...nning/autoware_route_handler/src/route_handler.cpp	30.16%	591 Missing and 78 partials ⚠️
...autoware_route_handler/test/test_route_handler.cpp	52.84%	10 Missing and 73 partials ⚠️
...r/include/autoware/route_handler/route_handler.hpp	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
...autoware_route_handler/test/test_route_handler.hpp	77.77%	5 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #201       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   78.75%   22.32%   -56.44%     
===========================================
  Files          11       23       +12     
  Lines         193     2101     +1908     
  Branches       73      735      +662     
===========================================
+ Hits          152      469      +317     
- Misses         11     1473     +1462     
- Partials       30      159      +129     

Flag	Coverage Δ
differential	22.32% <34.41%> (?)
total	?

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.