feat(radar_threshold_filter): add schema file for radar_threshold_filter and upadted the README file

[vish0012]

…ME file

Description

• Implement the ROS Node configuration layout described in Autoware Foundation Discussion #3371 for the (autoware_cluster_merger)
• Remove duplication of parameter declaration between the source code and the parameter file.
• Remove the default value from the source code to ensure all parameter values are passed from the parameter files.
• Use types that match those returned from declare_parameter() to prevent confusion and potential coding errors.
• Move the default parameter file to a standardized location. Use the JSON Schema for that.
• Create the schema

Related links

Parent Issue:

• Link

How was this PR tested?

Successfully build using colcon build --symlink-install --cmake-args -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release --packages-up-to autoware_radar_threshold_filter

Passed ros2 launch launch/radar_threshold_filter.launch.xml

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[YoshiRi]

LGTM
Please wait until the CI test passed.

[technolojin]

Please make the json-schema-check passed
https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware.universe/actions/runs/12860383472/job/35905376882?pr=9980#step:3:89

[vish0012]

I updated readme please run json again thank you

[technolojin]

there is mismatching between schema.json and param.yaml

🔍 Validating: sensing/autoware_radar_threshold_filter/config/radar_threshold_filter.param.yaml 🆚 sensing/autoware_radar_threshold_filter/schema/radar_threshold_filter.schema.json ❌ Failed

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 24.68%. Comparing base (fb1901f) to head (59df106).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #9980   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   24.68%   24.68%           
=======================================
  Files        1313     1313           
  Lines      102699   102694    -5     
  Branches    38998    38998           
=======================================
- Hits        25354    25353    -1     
+ Misses      74936    74932    -4     
  Partials     2409     2409           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	82.60% <ø> (?)
differential-cuda	82.60% <ø> (?)
total	24.68% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from fb1901f

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[vish0012]

there is mismatching between schema.json and param.yaml

🔍 Validating: sensing/autoware_radar_threshold_filter/config/radar_threshold_filter.param.yaml 🆚 sensing/autoware_radar_threshold_filter/schema/radar_threshold_filter.schema.json ❌ Failed

@technolojin thanks you for your comments, i have correct the json file , and check param file could try to run again thanks you.

[technolojin]

@vish0012 can you fix it?

[vish0012]

@vish0012 can you fix it?

@

@vish0012 can you fix it?

Hi @technolojin san i have fixed it can u try again thank you

[technolojin]

@vish0012
Hi. This PR is forgotten for a long time. It still didn't pass the json-schema-check test, so it cannot be merged.
Can you fix it?

[vish0012]

@vish0012 Hi. This PR is forgotten for a long time. It still didn't pass the json-schema-check test, so it cannot be merged. Can you fix it?

@technolojin Hi, thank you, i have correct and it running locally also could you check now , thank you