-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About DST on delexicalized response #11
Comments
Hi, Thank you for your interest in our work. Actually, we only focus on the delexicalized part of DST prediction as following previous studies. I assume the accuracy of the model on non-delexicalized slots cannot be well guaranteed due to the nature of our training and evaluation. One way to improve this might be switching the training and evaluation to the non-delexicalized format of the data. Best, Yixuan |
Hi, thanks for the reply. Did you mean that the comparison results between your model and other models are all trained and evaluated on delexicalized response (Table 4 and 5)? I have tried training and evaluating the model on non-delexicalized response and the performance seems better. Thanks |
Yes, that's right. Our model is evaluated on the delexicalized responses. It is quite interesting to know that the model can perform better on non-delexicalized responses :-) |
Hi, this is very great work. Congrats on being accepted by ACL2022.
But I have a question about the DST model. It seems that the DST model is trained and evaluated on delexicalized response. However, some slot values are mentioned in the non-delexicalized system responses. How can the model predict these slots correctly if it is trained and evaluated using delexicalized responses?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: