Skip to content

chore: make struct comment match struct name #903

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

avoidalone
Copy link

@avoidalone avoidalone commented Mar 14, 2025

make struct comment match struct name

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved messaging documentation for enhanced clarity in identifying response types for periodic vesting account actions.

Signed-off-by: avoidalone <wuguangdong@outlook.com>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The change updates a comment in the proto/vesting/v1beta1/tx.proto file. Previously, the comment before the MsgCreatePeriodicVestingAccountResponse message incorrectly referenced the response type. The update corrects this to accurately name the response as Msg/CreatePeriodicVestingAccountResponse, ensuring the documentation aligns with the defined functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
proto/vesting/v1beta1/tx.proto Updated the comment preceding MsgCreatePeriodicVestingAccountResponse from referencing Msg/CreatePeriodicVestingAccount to Msg/CreatePeriodicVestingAccountResponse.

Suggested reviewers

  • bdeneux
  • amimart

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a34947 and 24e2124.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • docs/proto/vesting.md is excluded by !docs/proto/**/*.md
  • x/vesting/types/tx.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • proto/vesting/v1beta1/tx.proto (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.proto`: Review the Protobuf definitions, point out iss...

**/*.proto: Review the Protobuf definitions, point out issues relative to compatibility, and expressiveness.

  • proto/vesting/v1beta1/tx.proto
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: test-go
  • GitHub Check: test-blockchain
  • GitHub Check: analyze-go
  • GitHub Check: lint-generated
  • GitHub Check: lint-go
  • GitHub Check: build-go
  • GitHub Check: build-docker
🔇 Additional comments (1)
proto/vesting/v1beta1/tx.proto (1)

105-109: Accurate Comment Update for Response Message
The updated comment now correctly references the actual message name ("MsgCreatePeriodicVestingAccountResponse") and clarifies that it is the response type for "Msg/CreatePeriodicVestingAccount". This change aligns well with similar patterns in the file and improves documentation clarity.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #903   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   45.03%   45.03%           
=======================================
  Files         113      113           
  Lines        6395     6395           
=======================================
  Hits         2880     2880           
  Misses       3380     3380           
  Partials      135      135           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant