docs(logic): clarify bech32_address/2 predicate limitations (HD deriv…

[ccamel]

Provide additional context for predicate bech32_address/2 about its usage and limitations.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Improved clarity on the address conversion process, detailing how encoded addresses combine a human-readable segment with a base64 portion.
  • Outlined constraints related to conversion compatibility across networks.
  • Added references to relevant external standards and specifications.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The documentation for the Bech32Address predicate in the address handling module has been updated. The comments now provide a clearer explanation of converting a Bech32-encoded string into its constituent HRP and Base64-encoded bytes, and vice versa. Additional sections titled "Limitations" and "References" have been introduced to detail constraints based on the BIP-44 coin types and to link relevant specifications and documentation. There are no changes to the actual code signatures or public interfaces.

Changes

File	Change Summary
x/logic/predicate/address.go	Updated comments for the Bech32Address predicate to clarify its functionality, detailing the conversion process between Bech32 strings and (HRP, Base64 bytes). Added "Limitations" and "References" sections.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #914   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   45.06%   45.06%           
=======================================
  Files         113      113           
  Lines        6402     6402           
=======================================
  Hits         2885     2885           
  Misses       3382     3382           
  Partials      135      135           

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
x/logic/predicate/address.go	90.90% <ø> (ø)

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

x/logic/predicate/address.go (1)

26-26: Fix typographical error in documentation.

There appears to be a version control artifact in the documentation:

- Base64Bytes is a list of integers (0-255) representing the Base64-encoded bytes git statof the address.
+ Base64Bytes is a list of integers (0-255) representing the Base64-encoded bytes of the address.

The phrase "git statof" should be removed as it appears to be an unintended insertion.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cfde952 and 2cd46b1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• docs/predicate/bech32_address_2.md is excluded by !docs/predicate/**/*.md

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• x/logic/predicate/address.go (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

`**/*.go`: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

**/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

• x/logic/predicate/address.go

🔇 Additional comments (1)

x/logic/predicate/address.go (1)

11-48: Documentation improvements are clear and informative.

The enhanced documentation significantly improves the clarity and completeness of the Bech32Address predicate description. The added sections on limitations and references provide valuable context about:

1. BIP-44 coin type constraints
2. Cross-chain address derivation limitations
3. Relevant technical specifications

These improvements will help developers understand both the capabilities and limitations of this predicate when working with addresses across different Cosmos ecosystem chains.