Skip to content

docs(README): add links to related Axone repos and polish protocol section #937

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2025

Conversation

ccamel
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel commented Apr 8, 2025

Self explanatory.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced clarity and visual appeal with engaging call-to-action elements.
    • Added a "Looking for more?" section featuring key ecosystem resources.
    • Improved formatting for supported platforms and audit details to boost readability.

@ccamel ccamel self-assigned this Apr 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the README documentation to enhance clarity and user guidance. It reformulates call-to-action elements by incorporating emojis, rewords references to the introduction blog and white paper, and introduces a new "Looking for more?" section that lists resource links for Axone's smart contracts, SDK, and MCP server implementation. Additionally, it standardizes table formatting for supported platforms and improves the audit section layout. No changes were made to exported or public entities.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md - Reformulated call-to-action texts with emojis for better engagement.
- Updated references to the introduction blog post and white paper.
- Added a "Looking for more?" section with resource links for Axone's smart contracts, SDK, and MCP server.
- Standardized table formatting for supported platforms and enhanced audit section readability.

Suggested reviewers

  • bdeneux
  • amimart

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
README.md (4)

32-33: Enhance Documentation Engagement with Refined Wording.
The updated call-to-action for the introduction blog post and white paper adds a modern and engaging touch. Consider replacing "for a deeper look" with "for an in-depth look" on line 33 for a stronger, more assertive statement.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~33-~33: Consider an alternative adjective to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...one.xyz/docs/whitepaper/abstract) for a deeper look at the protocol architecture and n...

(DEEP_PROFOUND)


35-40: Polish the "Looking for more?" Section for Clarity.
The addition of the "Looking for more?" section effectively guides users to additional resources. However, note the potential typo on line 37: "Axone' smart contracts" should be corrected to "Axone's smart contracts" to maintain proper possessive form.


54-58: Ensure Consistent Table Formatting for Supported Platforms.
The reformatted table header and rows yield a cleaner presentation. Please verify that the markdown renders as expected across different viewers and that the alignment conveys the intended structure.


212-214: Improve Readability in the Audit Section.
The new audit table format enhances clarity by clearly delineating columns. Ensure that all links (e.g., to BlockApex and the audit report) are functioning and described clearly for optimal user navigation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a4e5f9 and deb5be3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~33-~33: Consider an alternative adjective to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...one.xyz/docs/whitepaper/abstract) for a deeper look at the protocol architecture and n...

(DEEP_PROFOUND)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: test-go
  • GitHub Check: lint-generated
  • GitHub Check: build-docker
  • GitHub Check: analyze-go

@ccamel ccamel merged commit 89feadb into main Apr 8, 2025
21 checks passed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #937   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   38.72%   38.72%           
=======================================
  Files         113      113           
  Lines        6490     6490           
=======================================
  Hits         2513     2513           
  Misses       3857     3857           
  Partials      120      120           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ccamel ccamel deleted the docs/add-axone-related-repos branch April 8, 2025 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant